Just Tucker trying to be attractive to Greenwald's audience. Remember, he's trying to start his own empire... Need to appeal to lots of people.
Sure, I get that. I have no problem with presenting your views in a manner that will be appealing to an audience that probably doesn't agree with your core principles. But here, Tucker is just throwing out what we would have assumed were his core principles... he shined a spotlight on Milei by doing an interview with him, and the tone of his interview was very much sympathetic not only to Milei's anti-socialist views, but also his strong stance on
freedom. America is supposed to be "the freedom brand" among the nations. That's supposed to be our
thing. And Tucker waves the flag and vigorously associates himself with that brand. But then he spews verbal-vomit like the above and that throws everything into question, especially in Clown World with its ever-present controlled-opp and other shadowy weirdness hiding behind every blind corner. Attacking Dollar Stores is just bonkers... this is 100%
first-world problem whining. Grandma buying $5 of tinsel to put on the Christmas tree from the Dollar Store isn't what's wrong with the economy. There is a criticism that can be leveled at corporatism generally, because they are all in bed with the Fed to one extent or another, through the finance/banking system. But that's not the criticism he's making, in fact, he's singling out Dollar Store for being "ugly" by which I think he means something along the lines of cheap Chinese goods killing off local businesses, or something like. To whatever extent that that is true of Dollar Store (seems to me Amazon and Walmart are at least 1000x as guilty), it is because of its implicit subsidy -- along with all major corporations -- through the Fed and the banking/finance/regulation system which protects them from genuine competition. And the whole discussion is framed by Greenwald as a demonstration that Tucker is actually quite socialist (fawning the audience), which characterization Tucker does not even asterisk or clarify, so he means what he says -- he thinks that market competition is ugly, and that relatively small-time corporations in the grand scheme of things, like Dollar Store, are somehow the main symbol of what is wrong with the economy. What is wrong with the economy? How about BlackRock? How about FAANG/Big Tech? How about all the commercial banks? How about the NYC casino called Wall St. How about the Fed? How about infinite debt being poured over our children's heads? By continuing to look away from the actual problems which are
beyond obvious at this point, commentators like Tucker actually lead people astray, by giving them the false sense that they have "understood" what is "really wrong". Yeah, the ugliness of Dollar Stores. That's what's
really wrong with America...
