• Welcome to our new home!

    Please share any thoughts or issues here.


Trump threatens Zuckerberg with life in prison

Madison320

Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2012
Messages
5,776
This is an article on zerohedge. Apparently in his book Trump said he'll put Zuckerberg in jail if he interferes with the election. Trump is totally wrong here. He's got it backwards. The crime was the government threatening Zuckerberg, not Zuckerberg's actions.

Trump Warns Zuckerberg And Anyone Who Illegally Interferes In Election Will Be Jailed For Life

https://www.zerohedge.com/political...gally-interferes-election-will-be-jailed-life

So they'll put Zuckerberg in jail if he doesn't interfere, and they'll put Zuckerberg in jail if he does.
Either way Zuckerberg ends up in jail and I can't get broken up about it.
 
So they'll put Zuckerberg in jail if he doesn't interfere, and they'll put Zuckerberg in jail if he does.
Either way Zuckerberg ends up in jail and I can't get broken up about it.

Zuck's not going to jail.

Zuck is fine with being the middle man in an Eifel Tower.
 
So they'll put Zuckerberg in jail if he doesn't interfere, and they'll put Zuckerberg in jail if he does.
Either way Zuckerberg ends up in jail and I can't get broken up about it.

Would you feel the same if they put Musk in jail?
 
Would you feel the same if they put Musk in jail?

Somewhat. Neither is a self-made man. They both rode to prominence on government money. The only difference I see is there's no way Zuckerberg could possibly have not known he was working for the CIA, and if he thinks they would never sacrifice an "asset" he should have studied the Lee Harvey Oswald case more closely. Voluntarily joined the mafia expecting a long life? What do you want me to do, lift a finger to save you?
 
Somewhat. Neither is a self-made man. They both rode to prominence on government money. The only difference I see is there's no way Zuckerberg could possibly have not known he was working for the CIA, and if he thinks they would never sacrifice an "asset" he should have studied the Lee Harvey Oswald case more closely. Voluntarily joined the mafia expecting a long life? What do you want me to do, lift a finger to save you?

What about telegram or rumble? Would you care if they got locked up?
 
Trump is totally wrong here. He's got it backwards. The crime was the government threatening Zuckerberg, not Zuckerberg's actions.

These people are doing the governments bidding. I believe Zucks recent PR letter is probably prompted by the fear of Trump winning, and Zuck having to take on the DOJ. I personally would not mind seeing some of these lap dogs hung out to dry. Its the ONLY bright side to having Trump in office - so that he may have his revenge. I fear though that Trump is going to fall into his 3d chess tactics though, and bring in more deep staters. Meanwhile humiliating his true allies as he did in the last term.
 
These people are doing the governments bidding. I believe Zucks recent PR letter is probably prompted by the fear of Trump winning, and Zuck having to take on the DOJ. I personally would not mind seeing some of these lap dogs hung out to dry. Its the ONLY bright side to having Trump in office - so that he may have his revenge. I fear though that Trump is going to fall into his 3d chess tactics though, and bring in more deep staters. Meanwhile humiliating his true allies as he did in the last term.

Good plan. Just the government decide who can have access to the internet. What could possibly go wrong?
 
Would you feel the same if they put Musk in jail?

What's your basis of comparison?
One is the greatest champion of free speech in the world today.
The other is its greatest suppressor.
I see 180 degree polar opposites here. I don't know what you see that you'd think they belong in the same category.
 
Good plan. Just the government decide who can have access to the internet. What could possibly go wrong?
Yeah, 3d chess and artful deal making is what can go wrong. Every major "channel" is under government coercion (its all a matter of national security). The only plan is to dismantle it.
 
It's almost as if the things that Trumpkins complain about wouldn't actually change during a Trump administration
 
This is an article on zerohedge. Apparently in his book Trump said he'll put Zuckerberg in jail if he interferes with the election. Trump is totally wrong here. He's got it backwards. The crime was the government threatening Zuckerberg, not Zuckerberg's actions.

I think the warning (screwed up in typical Trump fashion) is to put pressure on Zuck to NOT be coerced by the government pressure because there'll be a new sheriff in town soon.

In other words, "Hey Zuck, if you shoot and miss, even if they tell you to shoot, the new Justice department will be directed at you. And, 'I was just following their orders', isn't going to be a good defense."
 
CLIP from SYSTEM UPDATE #323:

Mark Zuckerberg Admits FBI Lies Caused Facebook to Suppress 2020 Hunter Biden Reporting
https://rumble.com/v5cq5ok-mark-zuc...sed-facebook-to-suppress-2020-hunter-bid.html
{Glenn Greenwald | 28 August 2024}



Move along, comrade! Nothing to see here, move along ...

FBI Tricked Facebook Into Suppressing Hunter Biden Laptop Story
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jp7M3ScsHm8
{Nate The Lawyer | 30 August 2024}

Facebook is under fire after admitting they were pressured by the government to censor American citizens who were simply making jokes. This revelation has sparked outrage, with many questioning the extent of government influence on social media platforms. In this video, we dive deep into the details of Facebook's admission, explore the implications for free speech, and discuss how this could impact the future of online expression. Join us as we break down what this means for you and your freedom on social media. Don't miss out on this eye-opening discussion!



THREAD: Missouri & Louisiana sue feds for colluding with Big Tech censors

THREAD: SCOTUS: White House Can Influence Social Media Firms

THREAD: Hunter's Laptop


//
 
It's almost as if the things that Trumpkins complain about wouldn't actually change during a Trump administration

Its what Harris/Walz admin is going to.. She will be like the British Clown PM currently arresting people for their opinions and mean tweets..
 
Last edited:
If that's true, why is Trump the one threatening it?

bb6.jpg


 
Last edited:
What's your basis of comparison?
One is the greatest champion of free speech in the world today.
The other is its greatest suppressor.
I see 180 degree polar opposites here. I don't know what you see that you'd think they belong in the same category.

You're missing the point. Musk and Zuckerberg run private businesses and they should both be allowed to control their website's content any way they want.

Government is the problem not private business. Zuckerberg can't force me to do anything. It seems like a lot of anarchists get this confused and that doesn't make sense to me.
 
Back
Top