This involves more than just minors:
From "Defending Women from Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government", Executive Order, White House, Jan. 20, 2025,
https://www.whitehouse.gov/presiden...g-biological-truth-to-the-federal-government/ ,
https://megalodon.jp/2025-0127-0342...g-biological-truth-to-the-federal-government/ ,
https://www.freezepage.com/1737916988KXQZXWGEWE :
""
(d) “Female” means a person belonging, at conception, to the sex that produces the large reproductive cell.
(e) “Male” means a person belonging, at conception, to the sex that produces the small reproductive cell.
""
Ironically, this definition actually affirms that there are more than two human biological sexes, despite the document's declared purpose (and despite President Donald J. Trump's spoken intention on this during his 2025 inaugural address), since not all humans ever produce gametes (i.e., either egg cells or sperm cells). So according to this definition, they belong to neither the female nor male sex.
Further, the wording is muddled, since upon conception (i.e., the formation of a zygote), no human produces gametes. And sperm cells only start to be produced during puberty (i.e., for those who do eventually produce sperm cells). So one can read this as meaning that typical males aren't considered to be either male or female until such time during puberty they start producing gametes.
And unless the government is willing to go to genuinely insane levels in order to collect people's potentially-present gametes--such as performing transvaginal oocyte retrieval on phenotypical females' ovaries (since anovulatory cycles occur, so apparent menstruation wouldn't be proof), and testing semen-samples from phenotypical males (since azoospermia occurs, so merely producing semen wouldn't be proof)--then how is anyone to know if they are producing gametes? If a woman has had an obvious pregnancy, then she would know that she produces ova; but even a supposed biological father wouldn't know without a DNA paternity test or sperm test. Short of such demented lengths, the above definition is unenforceable.
Even for those humans who do eventually produce gametes, based upon the above definition specifying the term "reproductive cell", they would have to be viable gametes, i.e., capable of producing a zygote, otherwise they would not actually be reproductive cells. So for those humans who produce infertile gametes, per the above definition, they belong to neither the female nor male sex.
As well, there are many medical disorders of sex development which produce a physiological phenotype in humans that is either opposite of what their chromosomes would suggest, or an ambiguous phenotype (i.e., something in-between female and male anatomy), in addition to there being many sex-chromosome anomalies. For just one example of such conditions, there are people with androgen insensitivity syndrome who are chromosomally XY males, yet they develop in outward appearances as typical females, i.e., with a vagina, breasts, and the usual external feminine features, though they are sterile.
Which is all to point out that God, in Its infinite wisdom, isn't demonically mentally-retarded like many of His/Her/Its falsely-imagined followers: for whom Thinking Is Hard™, so they shan't be having any of that. They wish to keep things simpleton-simple, like their mammy and pappy taught them to do. None of that suspicious thinking-stuff for them! They worship their own degraded ape-conceptions and cowardly paranoia over God's actual design.
For what is actually motivating said imbecilic paranoia, see my following article:
* James Redford, "Societal Sadomasochism", Christian Forums, Apr. 19, 2019,
https://web.archive.org/web/2021030...m-threads-societal-sadomasochism.8111033.html ,
https://ghostarchive.org/archive/cM58L ,
https://megalodon.jp/2021-0305-0502...m-threads-societal-sadomasochism.8111033.html .
As I've said elsewhere: humans hurting other humans is mankind's favorite sport, and it's a massively lethal bloodsport.
* "SNOG - Everything Is Under Control", Richard Grant ( youtube.com/user/rgrant ), Mar. 19, 2013
Mirrors:
https://web.archive.org/web/20240227222123/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFaqsc4lNyk ,
https://ghostarchive.org/varchive/dFaqsc4lNyk ; id., Faustus Films ( vimeo.com/user3576277 ), Feb. 25, 2013,
https://vimeo.com/60439901 .
From "Protecting Children from Chemical and Surgical Mutilation", Executive Order, White House, Jan. 28, 2025,
https://www.whitehouse.gov/presiden...ildren-from-chemical-and-surgical-mutilation/ ,
https://ghostarchive.org/archive/u94Ez ,
https://www.freezepage.com/1738231130NEBRDYSDXU :
""
(a) The term “child” or “children” means an individual or individuals under 19 years of age.
(b) The term “pediatric” means relating to the medical care of a child.
""
Why is 19 years of age the magical number here, when usually a legal adult is defined as age 18 years and older in the US? So now people older than 18 years are legally considered "children", and their doctors are "pediatric[ians]", until they hit the talismanic number of 19 years?!
It's as if Trump is intentionally being mischievously asinine in order to purposely beclown the US government (along with a large contingent of his science-adverse supporters). Perhaps to show the collectivists of the prior years, who believe In Government We Trust, that a government which can supposedly give you everything can definitely take everything away from you. Including your life; and indeed your soul, if you believe in government. It reminds me of Trump's recitation of the lyrics to Oscar Brown's song "The Snake", except that as liberty-lovers actually know, the Snake here is the government.
From: Donald J. Trump, Truth Social, Jan. 28, 2025, 6:51 p.m,
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/113908666572035035 ,
https://archive.ph/ib4nh ,
https://megalodon.jp/2025-0130-1903-24/truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/113908666572035035 :
""
Today, it was my great honor to sign an Executive Order banning the chemical castration and medical mutilation of innocent children in the United States of America. Our Nation will no longer fund, sponsor, promote, assist, or support so-called “gender affirming care,” which has already ruined far too many precious lives. My Order directs Agencies to use every available means to cut off Federal financial participation in institutions which seek to provide these barbaric medical procedures, that should have never been allowed to take place!
""
It is Trump's "great honor to sign an Executive Order banning the ... medical mutilation of innocent children in the United States". This is rich, given Trump's mRNA COVID-19 so-called "vaccines" (such as Moderna's mRNA Spikevax, part of Trump's Operation Warp Speed) genocidally murdering and maiming untold thousands of children in the US and indeed across the world, of which "vaccines" he still cites as a feather in his cap; and Larry Ellison's insane January 21, 2025 Stargate Artificial Intelligence mRNA cancer "vaccine" project presentation given at Trump's White House.
I've heard the theory presented by many that Trump had to roll out the COVID-19 "vaccines" to prevent the deep state from enacting even greater horrors, i.e., with endless lockdowns, FEMA camps, etc. Perhaps so. But Ellison's completely unnecessary presentation hardly goes toward inspiring much confidence. Regardless, it doesn't remove the grim irony of Trump's foregoing post. I will say on this issue that at least Trump did initially state a correct cure in the form of hydroxychloroquine, and didn't mandate the shots.
Moreover, using force to "help" people who never asked for it nor wanted it isn't help, it's an assault. A glaring detail which gives a further proof that such supposed concern over these children is actually motivated by a sadomasochistic dislike of gender-nonconformity is that the intersex community has been desperately crying out for many decades to stop doctors from performing surgeries on infants and small children born with ambiguous genitalia in order to more closely conform them to a socially-acceptable genital appearance. With such surgeries, the physicians often choose the wrong sex to conform said intersex infants and small children to, and those surgeries often lead to severe iatrogenic medical complications.
These intersex people never asked for such surgeries nor had any say in the matter, yet where has been the concern and mass-outrage regarding this from the anti-transgender contingent? That's right: "mum" has been the word from the overwhelming preponderance of them. You could hear a pin drop, so quietly unconcerned have they been about the issue. Which is hardly surprising, since such coercive surgeries attempt to conform intersex people to conventional notions of sex and gender. Oh, the grim irony of it all rears its ugly head again. So I'm not buying their crocodile tears.
Regarding cancer, as I've pointed out previously on this forum, cancer is easy and cheap to cure. Basically this protocol involves, as close as practicable, a zero-carbohydrate diet (particularly a diet rich in saturated fats, a variant of which has been termed the carnivore diet); goodly amounts of vitamin D, zinc, vitamin C, and other helpful vitamins and minerals (especially a diet high in salt); and ivermectin and fenbendazole/mebendazole (with hydroxychloroquine possibly being a worthwhile drug to investigate regarding this). So no need for another global round of criminal insanity regarding mRNA "vaccines".