Trump claims Fulton County DA Willis had an affair with the head of gang

[SpiritOf1776_J4]

full headline:
Trump claims Fulton County DA Fani Willis had an AFFAIR with the head of a criminal gang ahead of probable fourth indictment in Georgia he says will secure his 2024 win
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...-indictment-Georgia-says-secure-2024-win.html

Donald Trump claimed the Fulton County district attorney who is expected to slap him with a fourth indictment soon is having an affair with a gang member in a wild tirade in New Hampshire on Tuesday.

'They say there's a young woman, a young racist, in Atlanta, and they say, I guess, they say she was after a certain gang, she ended up having an affair with the head of the gang or a gang member,' Trump claimed, referring to Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis.

'This is a person who wants to indict me. She's got a lot of problems but she wants to indict me to try and run for some other office,' the former president went on at a campaign event in New Hampshire, 'wants to indict me for a perfect phone call. This is even better than my perfect phone call with Ukraine,' he added, referring to his call with Sec. of State Brad Raffensperger.

Sounds like Trump fears the Georgia indictment more.

There is almost zero chance this is true - based only on how the da looks. Just more reckless lying by Trump over things that matter, with the word "they say" added - at some point this type of thing by Trump is going to result in some type of indictment itself, and the expected whining "well, I just heard it, I didn't mean any harm or threatening" is going to be of zero help.

 

[acptulsa]

All those years as a Democrat served him well. He still knows how to play that victim card.

 

[unknown]

I guess thats his only defense, "her pussy stinks!"

 

[dannno]

Sounds like Trump fears the Georgia indictment more.

It's going to cost him a lot of money, it's complete bullshit, why shouldn't he want to avoid it? Of course, it does help his fundraising, because everybody except those with TDS like yourself realize it's complete bullshit.. but it's still a distraction from his campaign, and it's a political trial meant to hurt his campaign. If you don't know that by now, then that is just sad.

There is almost zero chance this is true - based only on how the da looks.

How is there a zero chance it's true? She's going after a gang... she's the DA... "hey... I can get you out of this." "But how?" "Ummm.... you know....(smiles)"

I'm not saying it's true, but it's certainly in the realm of possibility.

Just more reckless lying by Trump over things that matter, with the word "they say" added - at some point this type of thing by Trump is going to result in some type of indictment itself, and the expected whining "well, I just heard it, I didn't mean any harm or threatening" is going to be of zero help.

"Things that matter" by SpritOf1776_J4... lol....

There are plenty of valid things to criticize Trump over, but your post is oozing with TDS... Also, curious, can you name one thing that Trump has lied about that actually matters? This one isn't even a lie, he knows not one way or the other, a lie is something you know is not true. It also doesn't matter.

 

[dannno]

I guess thats his only defense, "her pussy stinks!"

^This is an example of a lie [MENTION=27888]SpiritOf1776_J4[/MENTION]

unknown knows that isn't his only defense, and also knows the charges are complete bullshit.. yet he claims Trump's "only defense" is that the DA had sex with a gang member.

 

[Sonny Tufts]

can you name one thing that Trump has lied about that actually matters?

1. That he won the 2016 and 2020 elections by a landslide.
2. That he won the 2020 election.
3. That Article II of the Constitution allowed him as President to do whatever he wanted.
4. That there was massive fraud in the 2020 election that enabled Biden to be declared the winner.

That's just for starters. Of course, I don't expect any of the Trump lemmings to agree; they live in a different universe in which anything Trump says is to be taken as Gospel.

Re Trump's claim about the Atlanta DA: I suspect there'll be another defamation suit he will have to defend.

 

[SpiritOf1776_J4]

... because everybody except those with TDS like yourself

I voted for Trump before. I even was criticized on here for donating to his check election fraud campaign - until I checked it and realized he wasn't seriously challenging it in court. A lot of people who are now turned off by Trump are like me, and are even more turned off by so called supporters who call anyone who doesn't support Trump now never trumpers etc. That attitude makes me actively campaign against, it's a horrible spirit.

realize it's complete bull$#@!.. but it's still a distraction from his campaign, and it's a political trial meant to hurt his campaign. If you don't know that by now, then that is just sad.

Who says Trump is trying. I realized during the show attempt to fight election fraud by Trump - he wasn't trying, he was trying to lose by the most dramatic and damaging way possible. I've watched election fraud challenges closely through the years. He hired no real election lawyers, made no real attempt to fight it. He had a female lawyer with no experience who wrote a book - which I read on suspicion, and it was a horrible book - and one I could have written better (and I'm not trying to sell myself as a lawyer), and Giuliani, who isnt an election lawyer.

How is there a zero chance it's true? She's going after a gang... she's the DA... "hey... I can get you out of this." "But how?" "Ummm.... you know.

I looked at a picture of her. No chance, and that is more fact checking then Trump did.

"Things that matter" by SpritOf1776_J4... lol....

I would say some of the posts of Trump in the last week are bordering on criminal - like threatening anyone who comes after me I will come after them. Things like threatening or intimidating judges, prosecutors, possible witnesses and juries or giving the appearance of it are things that matter. Calling an opposing candidate fat, and making fat jokes aren't serious - something Trump has also done this week. Unethical, a horrible example of leadership, but not things that matter.

When Trump finally goes to jail, and his supporters that are left are still trying to justify everything he does, I will laugh long and hard at it all. True, the country will be trashed, which is what Trump has intended, but they'll still be justifying it.

And remember, I've been a conservative all my life, and probably have fought the good fight in ways you have never.

 

[SpiritOf1776_J4]

^This is an example of a lie [MENTION=27888]SpiritOf1776_J4[/MENTION]

unknown knows that isn't his only defense, and also knows the charges are complete bull$#@!.. yet he claims Trump's "only defense" is that the DA had sex with a gang member.

Trump's only defense during the civil trial wasn't any better. Then he defames the plaintiff immediately after losing because he put on no defense, and Trump loses more money doing that.

Trump just did something very similar. That may in fact be his only defense.

 

[Brian4Liberty]

...
4. That there was massive fraud in the 2020 election that enabled Biden to be declared the winner.
...

Just because Democrat officials in key swing states claim that there was no cheating does not make it a fact.

You use "massive", which is a standard weasel word used when discussing election cheating. The comeback being "it's not systemic or massive" if it was only done in a few isolated places (like Phoenix or Detroit). It only has to occur in swing states, and then the best cover is to do it in a metro area.

But if you want "massive", the efforts of the DNC-FBI-Media establishment to suppress Biden corruption stands as an example of election manipulation on a massive scale.

 

[Brian4Liberty]

... There is almost zero chance this is true - based only on how the da looks. ...

There is some special criteria for how a person in power looks, and if they are involved in manipulative sex?

 

[SpiritOf1776_J4]

Just because Democrat officials in key swing states claim that there was no cheating does not make it a fact.

You use "massive", which is a standard weasel word used when discussing election cheating. The comeback being "it's not systemic or massive" if it was only done in a few isolated places (like Phoenix or Detroit). It only has to occur in swing states, and then the best cover is to do it in a metro area.

But if you want "massive", the efforts of the DNC-FBI-Media establishment to suppress Biden corruption stands as an example of election manipulation on a massive scale.

There was a lot of election fraud going on. I consider election fraud a lot broader than voting fraud, including not following the laws the state legislature has passed on it, and trying to bypass the constitution on it.

I do not know or carefully looked at the numbers of voter fraud that occurred. I know the laws were not followed, and donated money to fight that in court, even though I didn't vote for Trump in 2020 - I wrote in voted for Jesus Christ. And black box voting is horrible and should be completely done away with.

But Trump didn't honestly try to fight that if you looked. I thought so as soon as I looked at who he hired and what he was trying to do. I became convinced when I heard that they were trying for a Hail Mary pass early on, instead of fighting it in courts honestly. You should never try for a hail Mary pass early on, you should try every other option first. And, fyi - I thought it should have gone to the state legislatures for not following laws. But I don't think that would have made a difference, because most of them would have gone with the claimed media result even if fraud (but I could be wrong). I thought that it should be done because it most closely follows the constitution and on principle.

Trump has no principles, so that isn't why he wanted to do that. He wanted to do it because it would most likely cause destruction - he didn't think the state legislatures would have changed the result either. But if he could get a lot of people behind it, he could cause a lot of harm. The harm was the goal, not the success of it.

What was Trump's intended harm, knowing that it could not work?

 

[SpiritOf1776_J4]

There is some special criteria for how a person in power looks, and if they are involved in manipulative sex?

The da doesn't look like a person even remotely interested in sex. I said I looked at a picture, I did not say I was telling a look joke. I looked at the expressions.

It's more fact checking than Trump has done. It's not remotely funny, but it is exactly what Trump does - to everyone. If it were true, it would be like the boy who cried wolf, after making up things a hundred times, no one believes anymore.

 

[unknown]

^This is an example of a lie [MENTION=27888]SpiritOf1776_J4[/MENTION]

unknown knows that isn't his only defense, and also knows the charges are complete bullshit.. yet he claims Trump's "only defense" is that the DA had sex with a gang member.

I know the charges against him are BS, politically motivated, everyone does.

My comment was an example of this literary technique called a goof.

I mostly just wanted to use pussy stink in a sentence.

 

[TheTexan]

Lol is this indictment about his call with raffenburger?

 

[SpiritOf1776_J4]

Could I make money by putting all Trump insults into a magic 8 ball, and make it a Trump newest defense ball?

 

[TheTexan]

Could I make money by putting all Trump insults into a magic 8 ball, and make it a Trump newest defense ball?

Or maybe like a card game. One set of cards has statutes you can charge him with, and another set of cards has people places and things you have to connect the charges to.

Whoever files the best charges wins

 

[SpiritOf1776_J4]

Or maybe like a card game. One set of cards has statutes you can charge him with, and another set of cards has people places and things you have to connect the charges to.

Whoever files the best charges wins

Too much work. Insults are easy.

 

[TheTexan]

Who says Trump is trying. I realized during the show attempt to fight election fraud by Trump - he wasn't trying, he was trying to lose by the most dramatic and damaging way possible. I've watched election fraud challenges closely through the years. He hired no real election lawyers, made no real attempt to fight it. He had a female lawyer with no experience who wrote a book - which I read on suspicion, and it was a horrible book - and one I could have written better (and I'm not trying to sell myself as a lawyer), and Giuliani, who isnt an election lawyer.

I agree. One could certainly make the case that he sabotaged it intentionally, as it sure looks that way. The only other explanations are ridiculous amounts of incompetence (also possible), or he was under threat from TPTB (less likely, but possible).

He chose a ridiculous clown team to pursue the election fraud and got predictably clown-like results.

 

[69360]

Trump is appearing increasingly desperate.

 

[TheTexan]

Trump is appearing increasingly desperate.

Trump is appearing increasingly awesome.