The RON PAUL "New Hope" is being attacked with FUD by NEWSCORP.............!

[rp08rp]

We need to get them to recant:

http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,22573763-38198,00.html



and the YT channel

From: eLIB3RTY
Date: October 12, 2007, 07:32 PM
Subject: Open Letter Response to News.com.au
Body:
Dear news.com.au,

Your article "Republican Ron Paul in possible "fake" online campaign" by Mark Schliebs is slop reporting that is entirely off base. I own the eLIB3RTY account that posted the "Ron Paul: A New Hope" video 2 days ago on YouTube. I am a professional film editor, and created the video entirely of my own volition in support of Dr. Paul. It is my first video I have ever uploaded to YouTube. As of this evening, it has topped 200,000 hits in less than 48 hours.

I am in no way associated with the Ron Paul campaign, though he is the first politician I have ever liked, and actually agreed with on most things. For the record, no one from your paper contacted me before writing this mess of an article. As journalists, you have a responsibility to check your facts before you write. This is a blatant hit piece with absolutely zero journalistic integrity.

This letter, and your response will be openly posted on my YouTube channel.

 

[walt]

hey the title says he's a senator, I wouldn't waste my time, people will see this as the garbage it is.

 

[steph3n]

so many about this already, search is working right now

 

[rp08rp]

OK, sorry, my bro lives down under

the ARTICLE IS STILL UP

 

[steph3n]

yep and people there believe it too

OK, sorry, my bro lives down under

the ARTICLE IS STILL UP

 

[rp08rp]

EMAIL THE EDITOR

[email protected]

 

[Geronimo]

This article might not get so much attention if people stopped giving this article so much attention.

 

[rp08rp]

This article might not get so much attention if people stopped giving this article so much attention.

THE FLIP SIDE IS, IS IF WE MAKE AN UPRAOR, THE TRUTH COMES OUT


MORE PEOPLE WATCH THE VIDEO!!



HEHE

 

[Ninja Homer]

I'm sure they're getting more traffic from that article than they ever have gotten before. Why would they take it down?