the Free State Project

[ThomasJ]

Live Free Or Die NH....

It seems like NH is not really all about liberty and freedom. I am wondering if you guys should instead of moving to NH and trying to make free with stuff like the Free state Project I think we should all of us Ron Paul supporters move to Montana.

Montana is one of the last bastions of freedom in the country. They have only recently added drunk driving laws (last 5 years)

They are very much for freedom there.

I just think that if we get the 10% of the population that believes in freedom and will vote Ron Paul no matter what to move to one state we can really make a big change.

NH on the other hand has had to much of an influx from Mas to stay free. Montana is virgin territory.

 

[Zibblu]

The reason that Montana might work better for such a project is that it has a much smaller population so it would be easier to "take over" % wise. ... But who wants to live in Montana?...

Plus nobody cares about Montana's vote nationally... NH is closely watched. BUT I agree if Paul can only get 8% in NH... this is not a good sign.

 

[BravoSix]

There's always the Free State Wyoming project, as well.....

Although, something would seriously need to be done about their primary/caucus system.

 

[integrity]

I love Montana! Lets go!

 

[Minuteman]

Montana sounds nice. I was personally looking at Alaska.

 

[ThomasJ]

I went up there during the summer - just look at this

 

[DrNoZone]

Montana, Alaska and Wyoming were all in the running for the free state when the Free State Project members voted on which state to choose. There was a lot of debate and discussion on the various pro's and con's of the different states. Check out the forums at www.freestateproject.org look a few years back and you'll see why NH was chosen as the most likely state to achieve success in.

I voted for Wyoming originally and dropped out of the FSP after the vote went to NH (per the rules); but I now see the wisdom in having chosen NH.