The problem with that sticky, is it is on the border of in-comprehend able for those of us who aren't really familiar with the political process of becoming a delegate, etc.
I really don't see the problem with the article from Devvy, I have read it before It's not really Dishonest. I'm not saying LIE, but what is wrong about not making your support for Ron Paul Clear? It's exactly as (she) said.
Get into the process, cheer for the GOP and say you love your troops, and when you get elected, just start representing Ron Paul. Where is the lying? Also if this is really the only way to get the man elected, and if the GOP is trying to shadily and on some points illegally censor and phase this man out, don't you think I am at least entitled to keep my real opinion about Ron Paul to myself?
Like I said, after reading that sticky (and some of Devvy's article) I'm still not too familiar in what she is asking for us to do. But the main gist that I caught from it, is that we need delegates, otherwise we'll either have a tough time, or he won't get elected. If that's true, is it really worth it?
Also you have to figure what's on the line here. If the difference between not speaking and honesty was directly related to America's freedom or prison like state, is it really worth it?
