• Welcome to our new home!

    Please share any thoughts or issues here.


Rule #6 has been tweaked

Joined
Feb 8, 2008
Messages
4,597
In order to clarify its meaning, rule 6 has been ammended. These rules have been created to establish in the spirit of American Transcendentalism a modern American Movement to, once again, reestablish the American soul, to consecrate the Founding Fathers, The Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution, to establish Civil-Purpose over traditional legal precedence and to improve our lives as Americans by altering, tweaking, clarifying and ammending the Consitution as little as possible in the process.

Rule #1. Never have too many rules.

Rule #2. Hate is un-American.

Rule #3. Never blame the people.

Rule #4. Never use the political spectrum as a playing field to bicker about politics.

Rule #5. Never give an interview with the media that isn't spontaneous, unedited and unrehearsed.

Rule #6. As Protestants hold the singular Civil-Purpose of the Holy Word in the bible over the legal precedent rituals established by the authority of the Pope and the Vatican, the singular Civil-Purpose in the Constitution should likewise supercede the traditional legal precedents established by the authority of tyranny.

Rule #7. As law abiding American citizens, we should prefer imprisonment, torture, death and the frangrance of an outhouse to the tyranny in a courtroom.

Rule #8. As a winning political campaign is a victory for tyranny, establishing a bipartisan American Movement is a victory for the people.

Rule #9. False American Movements are Administrations which fail to implement fresh measures while they dig up obsolete legal precedents from the past to implement.

Rule #10. The debt of the people should not be burdened with any legal counterfeit created by any foreign or domestic tyranny.

Rule #11. As legal lobbying on the Federal level benefits the rule of tyranny, the civil invention rewarded on the local level benefits the rule of the people.

Rule #12. There are 3 kinds of people: those with feeble minds who persecute people, those with immature minds who laugh about persecution, and those with the kinds of sober minds that get persecuted. To be an American is always to be the latter.

Rule #13. As our Founding Fathers established themselves on the foundation of a great history, tyranny establishes itself as its own foundation.

Rule #14. Taxes are created with the intentions of benefitting some while cheating others.
 
Last edited:
The American Movement is the purpose. Not winning petty campaigns.

"NEWS FLASH, Film at 11". :rolleyes:

Go ahead and continue posting your divisive jargon of complexity. In the meantime, I'm going to polish up 14 things in an effort to be bipartisan.

Oh. Rule #13 should read as follows:

Rule #13. As our Founding Fathers established themselves on the foundation of a great history, modern tyranny establishes itself on its own greatness.
 
Thanks for your thoughtful response


Rule #9 should read as follows.

Rule #9. False American Movements are Administrations which fail to implement fresh measures while they dig up obsolete legal precedents from the past to implement.

Is there anything to this rule that is unclear? True American Movements are Transcendentalism in nature in that they narrow the American focus to a bipartisan consecration of the Founding Fathers, The Declaration of Independence and The U.S. Constitution. This isn't the same as a totalitarian movement. The idea is to reestablish Civil-Purpose with the expectation that the American system will once again erode back towards tyranny. That is the American political spectrum when compared to the European one established by Aristotle's golden mean. We vary back and forth between the reestablishment of Civil-Purpose to that of being ruled by the legal precedence of tyranny. Legal precedence are just cruel traditions. The self-evident truths and unalienable rights trump these traditions.
 
Rule #9 should read as follows.

Rule #9. False American Movements are Administrations which fail to implement fresh measures while they dig up obsolete legal precedents from the past to implement.

Is there anything to this rule that is unclear?

Yes, there are some definitional problems in the above referenced "rule". Rules should be clearly established and well-defined as they are to guide behavior.

1) Name examples of "False American Movements" (how does one evaluate whether an American Movement is True or False?)

2) Provide examples of "fresh measures" (how does one evaluate whether a measure is fresh or spoiled?)

3) Cite specific legal cases that are "obsolete precedents from the past" (which court decisions?)
 
Go ahead and continue posting your divisive jargon of complexity. In the meantime, I'm going to polish up 14 things in an effort to be bipartisan.

Oh. Rule #13 should read as follows:

Rule #13. As our Founding Fathers established themselves on the foundation of a great history, modern tyranny establishes itself on its own greatness.

Thanks, I think I will. ;)

Actually, I'm a simplifier, however. K.I.S.S.!!! "Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler." -- Albert Einstein

"Complexity is the essence of the con and the hustle."

A very favorite of your's AND the other barbarians, as you do and should, well know. :p :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
Yes, there are some definitional problems in the above referenced "rule". Rules should be clearly established and well-defined as they are to guide behavior.

1) Name examples of "False American Movements" (how does one evaluate whether an American Movement is True or False?)

2) Provide examples of "fresh measures" (how does one evaluate whether a measure is fresh or spoiled?)

3) Cite specific legal cases that are "obsolete precedents from the past" (which court decisions?)

1) A legal precedent tradition is a used measure that was once deemed necessary for the sake of the people but now lay obsolete in the books relative to a new time and place.

2) A fresh measure is taken to move U.S. citizens towards regaining their American souls: by consecrating the Founding Fathers and the formal documents of The Declaration of Independence and The U.S. Constitution, by reestablishing Civil-Purpose over the traditions of legal precedence and, finally, by bettering the lives of American citizens while altering, tweaking, clarifying and ammending our Constitution as little as possible in the process.

3) With all due respect, I'm not an attorney so I don't speak the necessary foreign language to answer question 3.
 
Last edited:
Thanks, I think I will. ;)

Actually, I'm a simplifier, however. K.I.S.S.!!! "Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler." -- Albert Einstein

"Complexity is the essence of the con and the hustle."

A very favorite of your's AND the other barbarians, as you do and should, well know. :p :rolleyes:

Einstein submitted his theory E=MC^2 to less than 1% of humanity to understand. He then submitted his natural law, "God does not play dice!" for the rest of the 99.99% of us. The metaphysical conclusion, the one that is existential pertaining to mankind, should take precedence over the theory that isn't so.
 
Einstein submitted his theory E=MC^2 to less than 1% of humanity to understand. He then submitted his natural law, "God does not play dice!" for the rest of the 99.99% of us. The metaphysical conclusion, the one that is existential pertaining to mankind, should take precedence over the theory that isn't so.
Niels Bohr in response to Einstein: "Don't tell God what to do." ;)

Are you a < barf > "Existentialist" ( so called ) too? < gag > :p :rolleyes: That would sure explain a LOT. :p Mostly EUROPEAN too aren't they? It certainly appears that you just "buy into" any old barbarian crap.

< ROFLMAO ! >
 
Last edited:
Niels Bohr in response to Einstein: "Don't tell God what to do." ;)

Are you a < barf > "Existentialist" ( so called ) too? < gag > :p :rolleyes: That would sure explain a LOT. :p Mostly EUROPEAN too aren't they? It certainly appears that you just "buy into" any old barbarian crap.

< ROFLMAO ! >

Our founding fathers were existential in their purpose. So, while I'm not an existentialist, I am existential in believing that contentment should take precedence over responsibility. There is always some reason to use as an excuse for tyranny to forsake the contentment of its people.
Modern theoretical science today is not existential. Theoretical science has grown its hair out and moved off to live in its own International Community pad. The nations aren't worth spit. All governments shun responsibility. As is typical, all people are stupid to them while they themselves are smarter than Plato [sound familiar?].
 
I just don't get why you keep posting these "rules". Some of them seem sort of odd or pointless, some agreeable, and others quite fallible. What are you trying to push, exactly, and why does a new post need to be made because you are changing some wording in this self-formulated set of "rules"?
 
Our founding fathers were existential in their purpose. So, while I'm not an existentialist, I am existential in believing that contentment should take precedence over responsibility. There is always some reason to use as an excuse for tyranny to forsake the contentment of its people.
Modern theoretical science today is not existential. Theoretical science has grown its hair out and moved off to live in its own International Community pad. The nations aren't worth spit. All governments shun responsibility. As is typical, all people are stupid to them while they themselves are smarter than Plato [sound familiar?].
Very familar :( AND sadly incorrect AND barbaric.

Try lobotomy and / or Thorazine, if it's only contentment you're after. :p :rolleyes:

The "founding fathers" are DEAD TOO!

"Better a conscious slave than a happy one". ;)
 
I just don't get why you keep posting these "rules". Some of them seem sort of odd or pointless, some agreeable, and others quite fallible. What are you trying to push, exactly, and why does a new post need to be made because you are changing some wording in this self-formulated set of "rules"?

Okay. Freedom is the purpose. Always trust someone when they limit their laws, rules or commandments, because they are the ones truly seeking after liberty. The Ten Commandments are an example of what I speak. God does not give infinite numbers of laws as tyranny does. Tyranny will criticize the creation of laws while it is in the process of creating limitless numbers of laws.

So, we can gain control by creating our own rules. That is the purpose here. At one time Henry Thoreau created his civil disobedience movement. This no longer works because they just taze us. So, the new idea is legal abstinence. We continue to obey the law while we discontinue as patrons of it. We need to try to work ourselves out of the legal tyranny of the courtroom.

Take this a magnificent step further even. The Jews were trying to kill Jesus because they felt he had brought with Him a new religion to destroy the rich economy their 10 commandment religion had afforded them. Instead, Jesus blessed their economy thus damning the slaves to the bottom of their economy. Jesus then went to the slaves with a secret. That secret was a new covenant: Love thy neighbor as thyself. The almighty narrowed 10 laws to 1. This is not a person who wishes the people to live by the law but to live free.

The slaves did not own property, so people themselves became God's property. These slaves often times met under overturned fishing vessels while posting Watchmen (guards) outside. The worship of Christ was still illegal while the people caught, by Roman law, were sentenced to the same penalty as Christ Himself. The slave Christian sitting next to another became their neighbor.
This is how the New Covenant Christian slaves rose to have a greater economy than the Ten Commandment Jews.
 
You need a revelation to understand what it means to be an American

Very familar :( AND sadly incorrect AND barbaric.

Try lobotomy and / or Thorazine, if it's only contentment you're after. :p :rolleyes:

The "founding fathers" are DEAD TOO!

"Better a conscious slave than a happy one". ;)

I once drove my mother in law down to the hospital because her daughter, my sister in law, just had a miscarriage. When we got there, at a hospital in the vast Texas Medical Center, we were told to wait. Well, my mother in law was quite perplexed but she only had her green card. We kept being told to wait and wait and wait while I kept reminding all my Mexican in laws how important it is to be responsible as Americans.

But that is just not how it works, Dammit! Eventually being concerned for the happiness of her daughter superceded anything responsible trying to get in the way of her seeing her daughter. THAT is how things are supposed to work. Contentment should take precedence over responsibility. We take care of our thirst for contentment first and then the responsibility of eating becomes an enjoyment.
When a mother sees that her child is sick, she isn't perceiving that he or she is unhealthy, for this is just a secondary characteristic, but she sees that her child is not happy. Government tends to erode to the secondary characteristics of responsibility.
 
I once drove my mother in law down to the hospital because her daughter, my sister in law, just had a miscarriage. When we got there, at a hospital in the vast Texas Medical Center, we were told to wait. Well, my mother in law was quite perplexed but she only had her green card. We kept being told to wait and wait and wait while I kept reminding all my Mexican in laws how important it is to be responsible as Americans.

But that is just not how it works, Dammit! Eventually being concerned for the happiness of her daughter superceded anything responsible trying to get in the way of her seeing her daughter. THAT is how things are supposed to work. Contentment should take precedence over responsibility. We take care of our thirst for contentment first and then the responsibility of eating becomes an enjoyment.
When a mother sees that her child is sick, she isn't perceiving that he or she is unhealthy, for this is just a secondary characteristic, but she sees that her child is not happy. Government tends to erode to the secondary characteristics of responsibility.
Fine, I'll play.

The barbaric STATES discontents and "unhappys" ME and mine with their tyranny, leviathan, threats to our personal survival, etc. :p

Now just go right ahead, content me with that. :rolleyes: Give it your best shot! ;)
 
Last edited:
Fine, I'll play.

The barbaric STATES discontents and "unhappys" ME and mine with their tyranny, leviathan, threats to our personal survival, etc. :p

Now just go right ahead, content me with that. :rolleyes: Give it your best shot! ;)

I try to take some trouble to respond to you and the best you can do in response is pee on the page. Thanks a lot.
 
You want to do something. If you're going to do something, why not be productive? First start by making sense.
What's does "do something" have to DO with anything that is being discussed?

Of course you do realize that "making sense" is much more than just a little HILARIOUS coming from you? :D

Have you recently been eating those "glows in the dark" catfish again? :D
 
Back
Top