Ron Paul Wins CNBC GOP Pre-Debate Poll by a landslide! 68%

[jointhefightforfreedom]

Ron Paul Wins CNBC GOP Pre-Debate Poll by a landslide! 68%

http://jointhefightforfreedom.com/node/85

 

[richard1984]

Have they closed the poll now?

 

[Perry]

I swear you people need to clear your heads. Voting in pre debate polls is a strike against not for us. Think about it.

 

[0zzy]

I swear you people need to clear your heads. Voting in pre debate polls is a strike against not for us. Think about it.

"Damn Internet spammers at it again!"

It's true. It won't help him, if anything hurt him. Though I assume it won't do much but annoy the hell out of CNBC, "Why the hell do we even do these polls?"

 

[jrich4rpaul]

I swear you people need to clear your heads. Voting in pre debate polls is a strike against not for us. Think about it.

This could be true. Imagine if we didn't touch the pre-debate polls and someone else's wins it, but then after the debate, we vote in the "Who won the debate?" polls. Hmmm

 

[Taco John]

As a marketer, I think you guys are wrong. Books are going to be written about this election season, and the full impact of what is happening now will be fully appreciated down the line. Let them say what they will about the polls... We have the money to back it up. That war is done and over.

We just need to keep hitting them with the message that "politics is a participatory process." Any sign of support, no matter what form it takes should be regarded as relevant and meaningful.

 

[Ron Paul Fan]

Herman Edwards once said, "YOU PLAY TO WIN THE GAME!!!!!" And I think that can be applied here too. We should try to win any poll like this because that's the point of the poll. To win. We won and now we bask in the glory. If there's a post debate poll, we'll win again. If we had lost the pre-debate poll, people would question Ron Paul's support. They'd say, "Hey why didn't that kook libertarian who owns the internet win the pre-debate poll? Maybe his supporter's mommies took their internet away." Then we'd all be pretty embarassed don't you think?

 

[Perry]

This could be true. Imagine if we didn't touch the pre-debate polls and someone else's wins it, but then after the debate, we vote in the "Who won the debate?" polls. Hmmm

Precisely. If we poll the same afterwards as before then we have gained no ground whatsoever.

 

[jointhefightforfreedom]

Precisely. If we poll the same afterwards as before then we have gained no ground whatsoever.

Before doesn't matter The sheeple will be watching afterwards!

 

[JosephTheLibertarian]

Precisely. If we poll the same afterwards as before then we have gained no ground whatsoever.

I don't know about you, but I prefer to win every poll

 

[r3volution]

i say screw it , we took over the net and Washington's next . i don't care if the media likes it or not .
its not our fault the supporters of the other candidates are to lazy to click on a poll or to stupid to use a PC .

 

[goRPaul]

As a marketer, I think you guys are wrong. Books are going to be written about this election season, and the full impact of what is happening now will be fully appreciated down the line. Let them say what they will about the polls... We have the money to back it up. That war is done and over.

We just need to keep hitting them with the message that "politics is a participatory process." Any sign of support, no matter what form it takes should be regarded as relevant and meaningful.

Thank you for that. I don't know what people are talking about. A pre-debate poll with 4000 responses that nobody is going to notice can't hurt Ron one bit. I just voted for him, maybe you'll want to vote for Huckabee.

http://www.cnbc.com/id/21149087

 

[jrich4rpaul]

hmm.. yeah, all good points. vote away haha

 

[Danny Molina]

It's good to vote for Ron Paul in pre-debate polls.

The reason is if someone else wins it like Rudy then it will get press. Keep press away from the other candidates as much a possible.

 

[stevedasbach]

I swear you people need to clear your heads. Voting in pre debate polls is a strike against not for us. Think about it.

That's why I didn't vote in it. I want Paul to get more votes after the debate than before.

 

[dude58677]

No, it won't hurt us. We already have collaboration with the 5 million dollars raised.

 

[steph3n]

this was all a setup to see how many votes thy should deduct from post debate polls.

 

[anewvoice]

I think we need to be more concerned with what happens if we lose a poll. Oh the headlines, Ron Paul loses online support, Ron Paul web army loses key battle, yadda yadda.

 

[me3]

If you really want to goof the system, vote for Duncan Hunter. He's as close to unelectable as they come.

 

[CodeMonkey]

Precisely. If we poll the same afterwards as before then we have gained no ground whatsoever.

We just have to make sure we win by more.