Ron Paul finally Answers Question on Endorsing Bob Barr

[speech]

The Good Doc says he cant because: Chuck Baldwin is also running. BALDWIN WORKED VERY HARD FOR MY CAMPAIGN, HES NOW THE CONSTITUTION PARTY NOMINEE
says the Good Doctor.
Something that "Some" people lack.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H5YaqKf-yTg

 

[726f6e7061756c]

Your post is a bit misleading. He said he can't endorse one over the other.

 

[OptionsTrader]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H5YaqKf-yTg
"Some are leery" is Paul's polite way of saying people like OptionsTrader think Barr is a long time pro-war anti-constitution neocon with new fake Libertairn candy coating.

A request, link the youtube not some other ron paul site.

 

[MoneyWhereMyMouthIs2]

What I want to know is...

Why didn't Bob Barr endorse Ron Paul?

 

[Meatwasp]

Why should Ron endorse Barr with Root in there.
Good ,Baldwin is for me too.

 

[freedom-maniac]

When the Libertarians failed to nominate Gravel, they screwed themselves for having an expirienced candidate. When they failed to nominate Ruwart over Barr, they abandoned any principals they might have once had.

I mean, I can understand wanting to nominate Barr, even if he's a neo-con, because he's actually held a political office at one point, but so has Gravel, and Senator trumps Congressman any day. As Gravel once said, if Barr had read the Pentagon Papers into the Congressional record "he'd have been shot!"

 

[allyinoh]

What I want to know is...

Why didn't Bob Barr endorse Ron Paul?

THANK YOU!

I asked that question and someone posted a link about the L party and if RP was their nominee.

Baldwin has long ago endorsed Ron Paul and has been fighting right along with us.

I'm glad that Paul has not endorsed Barr. I think it would be a BIG mistake for him to do this.

 

[Alex Libman]

That's... depressing...

 

[WRellim]

THANK YOU!

What I want to know is...

Why didn't Bob Barr endorse Ron Paul?
​

I asked that question and someone posted a link about the L party and if RP was their nominee.

Baldwin has long ago endorsed Ron Paul and has been fighting right along with us.

I'm glad that Paul has not endorsed Barr. I think it would be a BIG mistake for him to do this.

Bob Barr did NOT endorse Ron because... well that would have required him to actually DO something.

Mr. Barr did not CAMPAIGN for Ron because... well, that would have interfered with time needed for his machinations to take over the LibiConsEvadetarian Party (Oops, I meant "Libertarian" Party the new name hasn't been officially published yet).

Mr. Barr does not adopt Ron Paul's REAL platform points because... well he really doesn't believe in them, he just wants the RP-colored "candy" coating to fool people into donating (which he care about a lot more than whether they actually vote for him...



What REALLY happened at the Libertarian Convention?



Conversely, not only did Chuck Baldwin OPENLY and PROMINENTLY (and REPEATEDLY) endorse Ron Paul...

Mr. Baldwin also ACTIVELY CAMPAIGNED for Ron Paul in Iowa and many other states.

Mr. Baldwin AND the Constitution Party also have taken on (FULLY in hearts and minds as well as on the "lips") nearly the entire "platform" of the Ron Paul movement.

There is NO question... to push the "Constitutional" movement forward... (both INSIDE of and outside of the GOP) ...Mr. Baldwin and the Constitution party are currently the BEST vehicle to that end. (Barr and "LibiConsEvadetarianism" are worse than a distraction, they are a dilution and subversion of the message).


.

 

[Minestra di pomodoro]

Baldwin needs Paul and Paul's supporters.
Barr already has the name recognition and could do without, in fact it's better for him, strategically, because he doesn't have to put up with the baggage associated with Ron Paul fans and some of Ron Paul's more questionable policies.

 

[allyinoh]

Baldwin needs Paul and Paul's supporters.
Barr already has the name recognition and could do without, in fact it's better for him, strategically, because he doesn't have to put up with the baggage associated with Ron Paul fans and some of Ron Paul's more questionable policies.

Yep, negative name recognition.

 

[Minestra di pomodoro]

Yep, negative name recognition.

Positive name recognition from being a congressman from Georgia.
You may not like him for his unwillingness to make Christianity the state religion, but he was voted in on more mainstream issues.

 

[allyinoh]

Positive name recognition from being a congressman from Georgia.
You may not like him for his unwillingness to make Christianity the state religion, but he was voted in on more mainstream issues.

I don't care if he's a Christian or not. I think it's bullshit that you are assuming that because I'm a Christian that I want and would vote for someone who wants to make Christianity the state religion.

You know, I think there is a Constitutional amendment against that...

No one that I talk to likes Bob Barr and would never vote for him. That's the negative name recognition I'm talking about.

 

[Minestra di pomodoro]

No one that I talk to likes Bob Barr

Talk to people outside of your church

 

[allyinoh]

Talk to people outside of your church

I don't go to church. Great assumption. Not every Christian goes to church. I don't like organized religion.

Wrong again!

 

[Minestra di pomodoro]

Wow you got me there!

 

[Perry]

I just don't think there is any question that Baldwin is philosophically closer to Paul than is Barr.

 

[allyinoh]

Wow you got me there!

Well you shouldn't make assumptions that because I'm a Christian I got to church and the only people I talk to are church people.

Assuming things only makes you look like an ass.

I haven't went to church in about 5 years and don't care to, not that it's really any of your concern, but I just don't like people who assume things about me or anyone else when they don't know what they're talking about.

 

[Minestra di pomodoro]

I just don't think there is any question that Baldwin is philosophically closer to Paul than is Barr.

There are plenty of questions. Barr has a record, and experience in government. Baldwin has just been preaching hatred for years.

 

[Michael Landon]

I'm leaning towards Baldwin but I'm not ruling out voting for Barr.

- ML