Politico reporting Paul has 1 delegate

[overcoming hope]

Politico reporting Paul has 0 delegates

is this true? I thought he had at least 2 delegates?

http://www.politico.com/

delegate totals tab on the right of page.

 

[Mystile]

he should have 6 now.

 

[dw1345]

he has 6

 

[tomveil]

he has 6

He has 6 based on the extrapolation of the straw poll results in Iowa/Nevada. Nobody really knows how many he has because they haven't gotten that far in the process. I would not be suprised if at this point he'll eventually have about double that.

 

[overcoming hope]

updated

now he is listed as having 0 delegates. Rudy G is also listed as 0 (I thought he had 2 delegates) I just sent a polite email asking about Ron and Rudy's delegate totals.

www.politico.com

 

[Badger Paul]

Actually he has eight projected (4 each from Iowa and Nevada) and could get more from both states.

 

[overcoming hope]

Actually he has eight projected (4 each from Iowa and Nevada) and could get more from both states.

it is more than a little annoying that politico.com (obviously a site for political junkies) can't seem to be able to update the delegate count. (and actually it is worse than that because a few days ago they had Ron listed as having 1 delegate and now according to Politico he has zero.

 

[Bradley in DC]

Dr. Paul, as Politico.com points out, as no "bound" delegates to him yet.

We are projected to pick up some in Iowa and Nevada as their caucus procedures progress, but those states have not finished their delegate selection processes.