• Welcome to our new home!

    Please share any thoughts or issues here.


Obama's parents met in a Russian language class.

max

Banned
Joined
Jul 25, 2007
Messages
4,453
Interesting...

Russian is not a commonly studied language in America. But during the peak of the cold war, it was common for US Communists to study the language of their Marxist Motherland.

The 24 year old African impregnated the 17 year old white girl from Kansas after meeting in Russian class.

"Obama's parents met in 1960 in a Russian language class at the University of Hawaii at Mānoa, where his father was a foreign student on scholarship."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama
 
Interesting...

Russian is not a commonly studied language in America. But during the peak of the cold war, it was common for US Communists to study the language of their Marxist Motherland.

The 24 year old African impregnated the 17 year old white girl from Kansas after meeting in Russian class.

"Obama's parents met in 1960 in a Russian language class at the University of Hawaii at Mānoa, where his father was a foreign student on scholarship."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama

Eh, a little over-speculative. I don't like Obama's Marxist trends much, but Russian used to be a lot more commonly studied than it is today. I used to hear stories from the University I graduated from about how huge and populated by eager students the Russian Dept was in the Cold War heyday. It was like Arabic is now in Universities: very popular.
 
Russian is not a commonly studied language in America. But during the peak of the cold war, it was common for US Communists to study the language of their Marxist Motherland.

The 24 year old African impregnated the 17 year old white girl from Kansas after meeting in Russian class.
but Russian used to be a lot more commonly studied than it is today.

Indeed. It was still offered at my poor rural midwestern public high school in the early 90's. I had two years of it, was a fun language, not that I remember much of it now. It doesn't surprise me one bit it was offered in kansas in the 60's.
 
They should have met in church, while voting, at work, or while conducting other activities approved by the House Unamerican Activities committee.
 
1) Condi Rice is fluent in Russian
2) the 2nd husband-Soweto, the Indonesian, was a communist, and almost killed by Sukarno
3) she may have taken the Russian course to meet guys; it was probably 90% male
 
What are you a modern day Mccarthy?

First of all, McCarthy was right....

Secondly, Obama's parents were heavily involved in left wing politics. When you look at the Russian classes from that perspective, it just adds more weight to my contention that Obama, and his parents...were all communists...

And if you're still not convinced....have a look at his economic policies that he's ramming down our throats.
 
McCarthy right? Give solid proof. From where I'm sitting, McCarthy was part of what's wrong with America.

Obama's economic policies are not communist. They may lean toward socialism, but they aren't communist.

And even if Obama's parents were communist, what is wrong with that? Communists can be quite intelligent you know, even if they are wrong on several premises. But just b/c obama's parents are communist doesn't mean he was.
 
McCarthy right? Give solid proof. From where I'm sitting, McCarthy was part of what's wrong with America.

Obama's economic policies are not communist. They may lean toward socialism, but they aren't communist.

And even if Obama's parents were communist, what is wrong with that? Communists can be quite intelligent you know, even if they are wrong on several premises. But just b/c obama's parents are communist doesn't mean he was.

Soviet archives , opened in recent years, confirm McCarthy was right. Research it.

You say Obama's policies are not communist?....Ownership of GM? Ownership of banks? Bailouts? Surrender of US sovereignty? Setting wages?

Try reading Karl Marx and get back to me.

You ask "what is wrong with being communist?".....That's like saying "What's wrong with being a slave owner?"..."Whats wrong with wanting to destroy liberty?"
 
If McCarthy was right, why did HE never give proof? Even if McCarthy was right on a few was he right on all of them? If not, was it worth it? The burden of proof was on McCarthy to prove his accusations, and he failed miserably.

Communism is complete shared ownership and production of all products. Socialism is all domestic production within a state and a strong safety-net for individuals. We have never had a communist, let alone purely socialist, state.

Obama has nationalized maybe 1% of the economy. That is hardly communism. Sure, he allows alot of corporatism in the US structure. So have most presidents since the later 1800s. But they weren't communist; they simply had a flawed view of economics.

We've had a minimum wage for a long time. We have lost sovereignty for a long time. Has every president been communist? No. Were they often erroneous in their beliefs? Yes.

If people choose to believe communism, it is because people like you and me have not won the battle of ideas and proved communism's failures. Communism in its end form is actually quite idealistic. I voluntary type of communal ownership that results in a utopia. Unfortunately, Marx's problem is the means he advocates towards that end.

Besides that, communists or socialists do have it right in some instances. They oppose many uses of force, just not government force. Even then, they oppose government force on say imperialistic wars. They fight for equal rights of all people, even if their ends to such a vision may be flawed. There are positives where we can work with people in any group. Similarly, there are flaws in any group.
 
Back
Top