NYTimes: State Sovereignty Movement is only symbolic

[Matt Collins]

The New York Times called in the experts and pronounced the the State Sovereignty Movement nothing more than a 'symbolic' protest.

Opponents of the measures and some constitutional scholars say the proposals are mostly symbolic, intended to send a message of political protest, and have little chance of succeeding in court over the long run.

But they acknowledge the measures could create legal collisions that would be both costly and cause delays to health care changes, and could
be a rallying point for opponents in the increasingly tense debate.

 

[Austrian Econ Disciple]

Fuck the times. The Sovereignty movement if it should be taken seriously at all, needs to use Nullification laws now. The resolutions are I suppose in their judgement the first shot over the bow, if it continues, then I would hope they enact legislation with teeth. That means Nullification and the refusal to pay or receive Federal Income tax. I think Nullification would be the more plausible path. After that if the Government threatens then secede. The latter needs to wait after Nullification and after the attempt of the Liberty movement. If both fail, then there is no other choice.

 

[Nate]

Oh well, the "experts" have made a declaration from their Ivory Tower. Time to stop working for our independence from Federal/Global tyranny. They made a pronouncement. I got their symbolism right here.

 

[ForLiberty-RonPaul]

Oh well, the "experts" have made a declaration from their Ivory Tower. Time to stop working for our independence from Federal/Global tyranny. They made a pronouncement. I got their symbolism right here.

i love you