NOW I know who to vote for!

[Sematary]

My goal, all along, has been to vote for Ron Paul and - if he runs 3rd party or independent, I will. BUT, I listened to Chuck Baldwin at the rally in D.C. and after hearing him speak and KNOWING that his religion does not come before his belief in the constitution, I could vote for him. I have actually been reading his weekly newsletter for quite some time and have alot of respect for him. I believe that if RP were to endorse ANYONE, it would be Chuck Baldwin and that is whom I will vote for come November if Ron Paul is not on the ballot.

 

[berrybunches]

My goal, all along, has been to vote for Ron Paul and - if he runs 3rd party or independent, I will. BUT, I listened to Chuck Baldwin at the rally in D.C. and after hearing him speak and KNOWING that his religion does not come before his belief in the constitution, I could vote for him. I have actually been reading his weekly newsletter for quite some time and have alot of respect for him. I believe that if RP were to endorse ANYONE, it would be Chuck Baldwin and that is whom I will vote for come November if Ron Paul is not on the ballot.

I probably will too but if you are polled say you are voting for Barr just so we can get Barr in the debates. Baldwin has no chance to get in the debates.
So at the end of the day I will probably vote for Baldwin though.

 

[JosephTheLibertarian]

My goal, all along, has been to vote for Ron Paul and - if he runs 3rd party or independent, I will. BUT, I listened to Chuck Baldwin at the rally in D.C. and after hearing him speak and KNOWING that his religion does not come before his belief in the constitution, I could vote for him. I have actually been reading his weekly newsletter for quite some time and have alot of respect for him. I believe that if RP were to endorse ANYONE, it would be Chuck Baldwin and that is whom I will vote for come November if Ron Paul is not on the ballot.

Protectionist Baldwin? yay

-wasted vote

 

[Sematary]

Protectionist Baldwin? yay

-wasted vote

Wasted vote is something I expect to hear from a sheeple, not someone with a brain. The only WASTED vote is the one that is never cast. Don't be a sheeple.

 

[JosephTheLibertarian]

Wasted vote is something I expect to hear from a sheeple, not someone with a brain. The only WASTED vote is the one that is never cast. Don't be a sheeple.

Chuck might not even be on the balot in your state. His party wants to outlaw porn!

 

[Jeremy]

The mere fact that you originally believed that Chuchk Baldwin would put "his religion before politics" simply because he's a pastor is a good example of everything bad that comes from an apathetic America in politics. And it almost comes across as prejudiced.

 

[Jeremy]

Chuck might not even be on the balot in your state. His party wants to outlaw porn!

You're a Libertarian, so you're trying to get votes from Baldwin to go to Barr... so you have an agenda. You can simply look at it the other way: Baldwin is running on the Paul message and will probably be the party's best candidate % wise. This is why their platform should change to Paul's (almost completely) after November... because he was the most successful candidate! I'm not saying it will happen, but it seems likely.

 

[revolutionary8]

Protectionist Baldwin? yay

-wasted vote

OH PLEASE.
"Ron Paul is a wasted vote"
JTL- Who said that? iow- Who "coined the phrase"?
If you find the truth, I will give you ONE MILLLLLLLLLLION DOLLLLLLLLARS
I get tired of the same old rhetoric.

 

[JosephTheLibertarian]

The mere fact that you originally believed that Chuchk Baldwin would put "his religion before politics" simply because he's a pastor is a good example of everything bad that comes from an apathetic America in politics. And it almost comes across as prejudiced.

Bob Barr wasn't even invited. Wonder why. I guess they preferred to showcase just one choice, huh?

 

[LibertyEagle]

Chuck might not even be on the balot in your state.

I'm thinkin' he will probably notice whether he is or not, when he goes to cast his ballot.

His party wants to outlaw porn!

Yeah Joseph, considering that the bottom is about to completely fall out of our dollar and our government is pounding the war drums for Iran, porno just possibly might not be the most important issue.

 

[Andrew-Austin]

Chuck might not even be on the balot in your state. His party wants to outlaw porn!

In all fairness the Republicans and Democrats probably secretly want to outlaw porn as well eventually (alongside controlling the internet). Baldwin becoming Prez (if its possible for him to do so) would not necessarily be able to outlaw porn any faster then it otherwise would have been already.

 

[JosephTheLibertarian]

I'm thinkin' he will probably notice whether he is or not, when he goes to cast his ballot.



Yeah Joseph, considering that the bottom is about to completely fall out of our dollar and our government is pounding the war drums for Iran, porno just possibly might not be the most important issue.

ha. You always try to undermine me, baby lol... Well, I'm not saying porn is the #1 issue, but you should know what the party you're endorsing believes in. The LP has an anti-war candidate with a stronger party and platform, what in the hell is wrong with the LP?

 

[Jeremy]

Um... hello? How is porn an issue? Baldwin has already said that he doesn't have that stance. Are you guys blind?

 

[JosephTheLibertarian]

Um... hello? How is porn an issue? Baldwin has already said that he doesn't have that stance. Are you guys blind?

Even so, he still believes in protectionism.

 

[revolutionary8]

In all fairness the Republicans and Democrats probably secretly want to outlaw porn as well eventually (alongside controlling the internet). Baldwin becoming Prez (if its possible for him to do so) would not necessarily be able to outlaw porn any faster then it otherwise would have been already.

Yup.

 

[Jeremy]

ha. You always try to undermine me, baby lol... Well, I'm not saying porn is the #1 issue, but you should know what the party you're endorsing believes in. The LP has an anti-war candidate with a stronger party and platform, what in the hell is wrong with the LP?

What's wrong is YOU basing your vote (and trying to get others to do the same) on the party instead of the candidate. Attacking Baldwin's party doesn't make any sense. I'll probably vote Baldwin. But if he's not on my ballot, I'll vote Barr.

 

[Jeremy]

Even so, he still believes in protectionism.

Who cares, we need to fix the dollar first anyway.

 

[JosephTheLibertarian]

Who cares, we need to fix the dollar first anyway.

No we don't. We don't need a national currency.

 

[Jeremy]

We don't need to fix the dollar? :o

 

[JosephTheLibertarian]

We don't need to fix the dollar? :o

Not necessary.