James_Madison_Lives
Member
- Joined
- Apr 11, 2010
- Messages
- 2,804
No word in the media about the violent threats against the Michigan election certifiers who voted to certify under duress and now say they want to rescind those votes?
https://evidence2020.wordpress.com/...certification-based-on-violence-pa-broke-law/
Not Debunked: Georgia Lost 30,000 Trump Votes, MI Certification Based on Violence, PA Broke Law
Perhaps the only campaign which has been more coordinated and determined to change a massive landslide victory away from the lightning-rod candidate Trump, often due to his own tendencies, is the equally determined “debunk” machine which now, with military precision, responds to any evidence of election fraud within hours.
The pattern is predictable. Write a piece which misrepresents the allegations ( the “straw man,”) prove it wrong, (the “debunk,”) then rapidly mock any further mention of the subject as “already debunked.”
The hope for the election fraud criminals is you have gaslighted enough people into thinking that allegations really have been disproven, to discourage them from looking much further into the matter.
The problem is that facts are stubborn things. There is a notable absence of “debunk” concerning:
The summary dismissals of cases brought not just by the Trump campaign, but by aggrieved normal citizens, were brushed aside for “no evidence,” with the supreme irony that there can be no evidence unless one looks at allegations and submits them to the discovery process.
The discovery process is when people are put under oath in depositions, and professional investigators cross-check records and data. If half of what the allegations in dozen of lawsuits and thousands of pages of witness testimony are true, we will be living under an illegal government if Biden is inaugurated.
Destruction of evidence, a relentless propaganda campaign, avoidance of the discovery process. This may now be the model for presidential and all other elections.
Should Trump prevail, the message from America from Trump-haters and lovers alike may be: If you are going to steal an election, you have to make it not as obvious as this.
https://evidence2020.wordpress.com/...certification-based-on-violence-pa-broke-law/
Not Debunked: Georgia Lost 30,000 Trump Votes, MI Certification Based on Violence, PA Broke Law
Perhaps the only campaign which has been more coordinated and determined to change a massive landslide victory away from the lightning-rod candidate Trump, often due to his own tendencies, is the equally determined “debunk” machine which now, with military precision, responds to any evidence of election fraud within hours.
The pattern is predictable. Write a piece which misrepresents the allegations ( the “straw man,”) prove it wrong, (the “debunk,”) then rapidly mock any further mention of the subject as “already debunked.”
The hope for the election fraud criminals is you have gaslighted enough people into thinking that allegations really have been disproven, to discourage them from looking much further into the matter.
The problem is that facts are stubborn things. There is a notable absence of “debunk” concerning:
- The fact that the selection of electors for the entire state of Michigan (16 electoral votes) is based on violence, in the form of depraved and disgusting threats against Wayne County (Detroit) certifiers, who have sworn in affidavits that they acted under duress. To this day, the two Wayne County canvassers want to rescind their votes, which would leave MI without an elector slate, and Trump that much closer to re-election. It is hard to debunk that the two officials were attacked by violent threats, because the FBI has made an arrest. Debunkers hate when that happens.
According to ABC News – Flint, among the threats which resulted in Biden’s ill-gotten electoral MI votes were:
“images of a bloody, naked and mutilated woman’s body lying on the ground — immediately followed by a photo of Palmer’s young daughter and a message reading, “I’d just like you to imagine that’s…your beautiful daughter,” according to [U.S. Attorney Matthew} Schneider.”
In short, the MI certifiers were not allowed to vote their conscience. - Undebunked is the fact that in Georgia (16 electoral votes,) two data scientists of stature have shown that 30,000 votes for Trump mysteriously disappeared, in the data files on which the counts are based which go to news organizations. Other data aficionados across the Internet have taken election return datafrom primary sources, in order to spot massive discrepancies not visible in totaled data.
One such web community is TheDonald.win. It contains raw vote data for all who care to examine it. These cannot be explained away as easily as “Oh it’s normal to roll out boxes of ballots in the middle of the night, after you have told reporters and observers to leave, and start counting after you have said counting was finished for the day.” Or something like that.
(Also see Epoch Times: “Georgia Data Shows Over 30,000 of Trump’s Votes Removed, Another 12,173 Switched to Biden: Data Scientists”)
- That in Georgia, as in Michigan, previously unheard of numbers of ballots, hundreds of thousands, were manually adjudicated, which means election officials change them, with no observers watching, to what they thought the ballots should say. The FactCheck.org “debunk” of this for Michigan was that ‘hundreds of thousands of ballots were NOT adjudicated by machine, because MI does not even have that capability.’
The FactCheck.org treatment reads:
“But state officials and Dominion — which has been the subject of conspiracy theories following the election — said the report was flawed and spreading misinformation. They noted that the county does not digitally conduct adjudication — when election workers need to review a ballot to determine its intent — as the report alleges. It’s done manually by reviewing the paper ballots.”
But adjudication by machine is not the issue. The debunk says nothing about hand adjudication of utterly massive numbers of ballots in both MI and GA. That’s how a straw man works.
- Debunks have not once denied the massive pattern of destruction of key evidence, such as the adjudication logs in Michigan, even though the logs did not get deleted for previous years.
- No debunk has denied that the massive number of manual adjudications in GA were all from the same account. This is like signing into a cash register as a clerk, and then letting everyone in the store use that register.
- The law was illegally changed in Pennsylvania (20 electoral votes) for mail-in ballots, so that more could be counted as they arrived without even a signature or postmark. The case was dismissed by the US Supreme Court, even though Justice Alito saw enough merit in the case to order mail-in ballots received after election day to be segregated. In the end, the best the US Supreme Court could mange was, that if the Trump campaign did not like the law, it should have said something sooner.
The Day reported:
“Justices on the state high court ruled unanimously late Saturday that Republican petitioners waited too long to file their suit challenging Act 77…”
Thus, on a procedural count, the US Supreme Court shirked its duty, for pay of $250,000 a year from taxpayers each, to hear grievances, and left the nation to all but civil war. or secessions.
The summary dismissals of cases brought not just by the Trump campaign, but by aggrieved normal citizens, were brushed aside for “no evidence,” with the supreme irony that there can be no evidence unless one looks at allegations and submits them to the discovery process.
The discovery process is when people are put under oath in depositions, and professional investigators cross-check records and data. If half of what the allegations in dozen of lawsuits and thousands of pages of witness testimony are true, we will be living under an illegal government if Biden is inaugurated.
Destruction of evidence, a relentless propaganda campaign, avoidance of the discovery process. This may now be the model for presidential and all other elections.
Should Trump prevail, the message from America from Trump-haters and lovers alike may be: If you are going to steal an election, you have to make it not as obvious as this.
Last edited:
