• Welcome to our new home!

    Please share any thoughts or issues here.


FED: No Clothes: Chinese give PM Kevin Rudd lesson on neoliberalism

tron paul

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2007
Messages
690
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,25657881-601,00.html

Rowan Callick, Asia-Pacific editor | June 19, 2009
Article from: The Australian

KEVIN Rudd has been accused by a leading Chinese economist of being "either short of economic knowledge or misleading his readers" in his famous essay attacking neoliberalism.

In a scathing assessment, Xu Xaonian, economics professor at China Europe International Business School in Shanghai, lambasts the essay, now translated and published in China, as "shallow and crude".

Dr Xu says "Lu Kewen" - Mr Rudd's Chinese name - made a "big, big mistake" in forming his "confident opinions" based on "the observation that the crisis came as a result of neoliberalism and the absence of supervision".

Dr Xu, one of China's leading liberal economists, has savaged the Rudd essay in the weekly Chinese newspaper The Economic Observer after the Prime Minister's work was translated and reprinted in China's leading business magazine, Caijing.

Dr Xu, who has a doctorate from the University of California and was formerly managing director of the country's biggest investment bank, says it is not time to resurrect Keynesianism, as Mr Rudd proposes.

"Instead, it's time to announce Keynesianism's failure, time to announce the emperor Lord Keynes has no clothes."

He says the Prime Minister "has used electioneering-style tactics to brand neoliberalism as dogmatic, to paint a clownish portrait of it, seeking to pioneer popular antipathy to this artificial enemy, casting a moral verdict without seeming to care about truth or logic".

Dr Xu says: "Lu Kewen defined Alan Greenspan as a neoliberal, and claiming that his failure and that of the neoliberals is a failure of the market.

"Lu is either short of economic knowledge or is misleading his readers. Greenspan is a Keynesian, and a thoroughgoing one, not a neoliberal. Lu smartly transformed a failure of government into a failure of the market - a form of propaganda by him and his social democrat comrades which now looks as if it is working."

Dr Xu says that Mr Rudd "views himself as an heir of Franklin Roosevelt and Keynes - he wants to use expansionary financial policies to pull the economy out of recession".

"Instead, it will only add a fresh failure to the Keynesian list, while piling up votes, in the meantime, for the social democrats," he says. "Although filled with conclusions contrary to facts and unfounded policy prescriptions, it represents a popular post-downturn trend, especially because it comes from a country's prime minister."
 
Most people praise Keynesian economics even though most only know it as what we are seeing today, yet when I ask them how you fix massive debt and over leveraging with more massive debt and over leveraging they look dumbfounded and confused and say "you can't". People are so stupid. We have a lot of work to do. If China wasn't a Communist country I would seriously consider moving there and claiming it the new America. I still wish we could get our hands on a youtube of Geitners comedy tour over there.
 
Are we really hearing a Chinese economist criticizing a western policy advocate for being too socialist?

Hell HAS frozen over.
 
If China wasn't a Communist country I would seriously consider moving there and claiming it the new America. I still wish we could get our hands on a youtube of Geitners comedy tour over there.

I don't see why the label on the box means anything to you. China is much less socialistic than the US.

I'm seriously considering a move to China myself.
 
Some months ago Putin warned Obama about the dangers of socialism.

The difference is China actually practices what it preaches. Russia would return to its Soviet days in a heartbeat if it could. I don't see a good future for the Russian people until they gain more respect for private property. Even Jim Rogers refuses to invest there.

IMO, Russia and India should be excluded from the BRIC "developing" economies gang.
 
The difference is China actually practices what it preaches. Russia would return to its Soviet days in a heartbeat if it could. I don't see a good future for the Russian people until they gain more respect for private property. Even Jim Rogers refuses to invest there.

IMO, Russia and India should be excluded from the BRIC "developing" economies gang.

Probably, I was going just for the irony.

I agree in much of what you say, but China has a problem. It has economical freedom but not social freedom. They are still under control of a fascist regime, even if they allow economic freedom because they are interested in growing. But what will happen in the future?
 
Irony is Pravda interviewing Ron Paul and presenting free market views.

The global elites = the false left / right paradigm doesn't just work within a country... it also works internationally.

The Old Right knew this... the whole cold war was an excuse for the increase of state power in both countries and world wide...
 
China is economically pretty liberal, but politically they're still communist and authoritarian.
 

True. I think Jim Rogers or Schiff once said that a free economy and an authoritarian state cant co-exist for long. I think revolution in China will come one day, hopefully when the young generations get into action.
 
China follows a self centered policy in other words as long as it benefits chinese communist government they will follow what ever ideology there is out there . For example through a policy of intimidation they forced a lot of shipping companies to use Honk Kong rather than Singapore as their port for good.
 
Back
Top