Lord Xar
Member
- Joined
- Jun 24, 2007
- Messages
- 7,803
I figure they're probably going to get amnesty. It'll be fine, as long as restrictions are eased for legal immigrants. Immigrating to the country is insanely difficult.
I figure they're probably going to get amnesty. It'll be fine, as long as restrictions are eased for legal immigrants. Immigrating to the country is insanely difficult.
Do you really want the US to be a 3rd world country?
The point is that THEY GET CITIZENSHIP IN 24hours..... They are suppose to get a background check or 24 hours.. WHATEVER COMES FIRST!!
Now, the legal path takes, how long???? think on that.. and how unfair this bill is.
Bush wants SLAVE LABOUR FOR BIG BUSINESS and to promote his North American Union (SPP) .... lets wake up people
Population explosion sounds great. That's what fueled the Industrial Revolution in this country and made the US an economic powerhouse.
I agree, legal immigration is insanely unfair and is fueling the illegal immigration into this country.
I agree, legal immigration is insanely unfair and is fueling the illegal immigration into this country.
Oh good, we've moved on to personal attacks.No, you are wrong. You are schill and it sounds like it.
Yep, the Irish, Scottish and Italians that immigrated to this country were pretty poor. Then they worked hard and made something of themselves, had children and grandchildren, and here I am today, grandson of a Scottish immigrant and plenty successful, and no government program fed my grandfather.When you have a HUGE population of LOW SKILLED workers with Minimal education, you create a HUGE mass of poor people.
How exactly will the middle class be paying the bill if we get rid of the IRS? Ah yes, they won't. If people want to come here, they can, but not on the back of any entitlement program.There are already tax breaks for big business and the rich.. so who do you think will pay for this social epidemic.. yes, the middle class.
Yes, immigration is morally analogous to murder.Your analogy is wrong because it presumes POPULATION caused the industrial revolution... that is like saying "murder" is okay because without the slaughter of the indians we would of never been a great nation.
No, we defend our borders. Easing legal immigration regulations reduces the massive influx of illegal immigration and allows us to actually screen the people coming in, and also makes enforcement of illegal immigration easier.So in order to solve the illegal immigration problem we need to just do away with our borders and cease to be a sovereign nation?
I'm the grandson of Alec Anderson, a Scottish immigrant who thinks others should have the same rights to immigrate as my ancestors did.Are you Jorge Boosh's illegitimate son?
Okay. I see what you are doing..
Again, immigration is NOT the fuel, legal or otherwise. You are a typical word twister and argument creator. You pick a topic and then create assanine statements that have no bearing on the actual argument you are trying to manuever.
No, we defend our borders. Easing legal immigration regulations reduces the massive influx of illegal immigration and allows us to actually screen the people coming in, and also makes enforcement of illegal immigration easier.
I'm the grandson of Alec Anderson, a Scottish immigrant who thinks others should have the same rights to immigrate as my ancestors did.
Oh good, we've moved on to personal attacks.
Yep, the Irish, Scottish and Italians that immigrated to this country were pretty poor. Then they worked hard and made something of themselves, had children and grandchildren, and here I am today, grandson of a Scottish immigrant and plenty successful, and no government program fed my grandfather.
How exactly will the middle class be paying the bill if we get rid of the IRS? Ah yes, they won't. If people want to come here, they can, but not on the back of any entitlement program.
Yes, immigration is morally analogous to murder.
Population FUELED the Industrial Revolution, it didn't CAUSE it. Without all the low level workers, there would have been no economic boom.
Only the bad ones. The ones that are criminals in their own country will continue to try to break in illegally, but now our Border Patrol will ONLY have to look for them. All the ones that just want to come work, be peaceful, and make money will go through the legal channels.Why would you want to screen the immigrants? Isn't that what you're complaining about? Won't screening them just cause them to enter illegally?
Yes they are. First generations, as always, have a hard time integrating. Second generations continue to integrate, attending the same schools and speaking English. Third generations often don't even speak Spanish, as in the case of an ex of mine.After the great flood of immigrants from Europe, our government put a stop on immigration in order to allow the newcomers to assimilate into American society. They have for the most part.
The new flood of immigrants from points south are not assimilating. It seems as though they have no desire to as was witnessed by the waving of the Mexican flags at last years first illegal immigration rallies.
Yeah, except Ron Paul and I advocate eliminating those programs, not keeping them.Your grandfather did not sponge off the taxpayers of the country when he came and that is good. But, the welfare programs did not exist at that time. Now they do. Now the illegals take full advantage of the "generosity" of our lawmakers.
There you go again. Why don't you address the arguments I'm making rather than attacking me as a person? Legal immigration is how this country became king of the world during the Industrial Revolution.
Yes, so let's get rid of the entitlement programs.Well, you answered pretty much everyones argument here. Your grandfather didn't get handouts, so he had to assimilate and make his own way. Illegals nowadays get handouts. They get alot of handouts. So much so, that they pretty much can get on welfare, education, and medical care and never have to assimliate. Sounds like a great deal.
There were people making that exact argument during that period of immigration. There were "anti-Chinese" leagues, and American unions that opposed European immigration and even physically attacked the immigrants.We 'needed' the workers back when you are quoting. We needed them. WE DO NOT NEED 20 million workers. I am sorry. We have Americans for that.
Also a very common argument during the Industrial Revolution. New jobs developed and we developed a sophisticated service economy. The Internet allowed all new labor frontiers. This new wave will help us just as much as the European and Asian immigrants did in those days.The only thing is BIG BUSINESS will not pay a worthy wage. When I painted 15 years, I made $10/hr. Here we are 15years later, and that pays $8/hr... why? Flooding the labour pool with LOW SKILLED WORKERS.. so American workers are displaced and they hire illegals. Completely wrong.
Maybe your family did, but this country was full of angry first-gen parents who would yell at their children for speaking anything other than the native tongue in the house. By the second generation, they were bilingual, and third generations were pretty much totally Americanized. That continues to be true today.Not only that... the time you are talking about, my grandfather ALSO came over - From Italy. My family assimilated quickly. We didn't have our language in readily available newspapers, and alternate tv shows.. and in government offices...
I'd like to see some figures on this, but Ellis Island was basically wide open. Anyone who wanted to come was allowed to. Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses, yearning to breathe free.Also, the NUMBER of immigrants all those years ago is dwarfed by the level of illegal immigration and of the LEGAL immigration of a million a year.. especially when that LEGAL and ILLEGAL immigration is disproportionate from ONE country.