My response from the Mike Church show

[shrugged0106]

I was so impressed that I have heard Dr. Paul's name in a positive light, on just about every show since the Debate. So I sent him a note of thanks. See his producers response below!

Mike Church is a Conservative radio host on the Sirrius Patriot channel,


hey don! thanks for your feedback. really, the only big beef we
have with ron paul is his anti-war stance, but we love his take on
federalism and small government.

i'll check out the video later tonight.

have a good day, don!
-talcolm

James Parker
Producer: The Mike Church Show
SIRIUS Satellite - Patriot 144
[email protected]
985.867.1774


On Sep 11, 2007, at 4:22 PM, Don wrote:

This is an enquiry e-mail via http://www.mikechurch.com/joomla from:
Don <


Mike, I just wanted to send you a heartfelt thanks for the
spirit of fairness that you continually show on the topic of Ron
Paul. I am a Ron Paul conservative and I am saddened by the
mistreatment of him by many whom I have held in high regard in the
GOP and it's punditry in the recent past. You show honor in your
show when he comes up. Thanks for that!!
Here is a great audio file of his 09'11 speech at Johns Hopkins.
It's one that all voters need to hear.
http://www.sais-jhu.edu/mp3_player/fall2007/ronpaul091107.htm

 

[rodent]

As far as I'm concerned, being anti-war IS being small-government.

The reason is because we don't actually have the money to fight the war. Where do they think we're getting the money from? Suppose China nukes our dollar tomorrow and our economy collapses. Does it make sense to be empire building under economic collapse? I don't understand why neo-conservatives don't think all of this isn't interlinked.

If we were TRULY wealthy, the war would be an easier sell. We're bankrupt and broke. This is a no-brainer.

Peace can save us money, save our economy, and save both American and Iraqi lives. What are our leaders thinking?

Man, I love Ron Paul. The man just talks straight sense.

 

[Cowlesy]

The thing is if a nation attacked the United States, the Paul Administration would rain down fire on that nation. To me he isn't anti-war, but anti wars-of-choice.