.
.
Unfortunately, the biggest lie told, which shut down 76 million people who wanted nothing more than our Supreme Court to give a hearing to a list of grievances found in the Texas BILL OF COMPLAINT, a shutdown by the Court which understandably provoked 76 million American Citizens, has suspiciously been ignored by Mitch McConnell ___ the biggest lie told was the Supreme Court falsely asserting that Texas had not demonstrated a “judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another State conducts its elections”.
The assertion that Texas had not demonstrated a “judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another State conducts its elections”, when the charges set forth in the Texas brief and complaint summarize and detail both illegal and fraudulent election practices in not one, but in four States _ practices which undeniably violate our federal Constitution and have corrupted the outcome of a federal election _ most certainly do demonstrate a judicially cognizable interest, not only for the State of Texas, but for the entire United States and her citizens.
As succinctly stated by a noteworthy Justice of our Supreme Court eighty years ago, when acts of corruption infect a federal electoral process in one state “they transcend mere local concern and extend a contaminating influence into the national domain” _ __ Justice DOUGLAS in United States v. Classic (1941)".
JWK
When our federal judicial system ignores our written Constitution and assents to legislative acts contrary to our supreme law of the land, it not only opens the door to anarchy, but participates in such treachery.
.
Unfortunately, the biggest lie told, which shut down 76 million people who wanted nothing more than our Supreme Court to give a hearing to a list of grievances found in the Texas BILL OF COMPLAINT, a shutdown by the Court which understandably provoked 76 million American Citizens, has suspiciously been ignored by Mitch McConnell ___ the biggest lie told was the Supreme Court falsely asserting that Texas had not demonstrated a “judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another State conducts its elections”.
The assertion that Texas had not demonstrated a “judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another State conducts its elections”, when the charges set forth in the Texas brief and complaint summarize and detail both illegal and fraudulent election practices in not one, but in four States _ practices which undeniably violate our federal Constitution and have corrupted the outcome of a federal election _ most certainly do demonstrate a judicially cognizable interest, not only for the State of Texas, but for the entire United States and her citizens.
As succinctly stated by a noteworthy Justice of our Supreme Court eighty years ago, when acts of corruption infect a federal electoral process in one state “they transcend mere local concern and extend a contaminating influence into the national domain” _ __ Justice DOUGLAS in United States v. Classic (1941)".
JWK
When our federal judicial system ignores our written Constitution and assents to legislative acts contrary to our supreme law of the land, it not only opens the door to anarchy, but participates in such treachery.
