Lets come to a consensus Either Baldwin or Barr!

[bucfish]

I personally say Baldwin as he did more for Paul than did Barr as where waqs Barr in the Early Days?

 

[Indy Vidual]

The CP wants too much religion in government.
Look on the front page of their website.

 

[Truth Warrior]

Let's be individuals and not!

 

[bucfish]

Yeah But Baldwin is a Maverick so too speak in the CP he perfectly understands the seperation of Church and State and the freedom of Religion in the US Constitution. Listen to the man not his party. For if I listened to the GOP I would never have supported Ron Paul!

 

[brandon]

Barwin!

 

[brandon]

Actually, read my signature

 

[OptionsTrader]

Baldwin.

Not Barr.
Reason 1
Reason 2
Reason 3
Reason 4
Reason 5
Reason 6
Reason 7

 

[FrankRep]

The CP wants too much religion in government.
Look on the front page of their website.

To quote of the Chairman of the Ohio Constitution Party, Robert Owens:

First, there are some elements of the CP that advocate for a theocracy. They are a minority. They supported Alan Keyes. Alan was beat by Chuck Baldwin 3 to 1.

The majority of the CP membership (which includes Christians, Jews, Pagans, Taoist, Atheists (yes, even atheists) etc.) understands Ben Franklin's warning, "As nations become more corrupt and vicious, they have more need of masters." Hard Drugs, Gambling, Pornography (I have meet many people that see me to get a Divorce that point to this as a MAJOR reason for the failure of the marriage) etc will take a toll on society. Liberty is not license. Liberty has responsibility. Morality is important.

The CP does NOT advocate that the Government should get involved in these issues, and certainly not the Federal Government. The CP does advocate that citizens should be aware of these issues and that they should be resolved in the family and in the church. The idea of a government sponsored gambling (lotto) is repulsive.

The CP advocates a return to a time tested, proven recipe for peace, prosperity and freedom. Alexis DeTocqueville in "Democracy in America" documents the ingredients for the recipe: 1) the government should only perform a few defined tasks but stay out of our lives otherwise. 2) The people must be a moral people.

SOURCE:
http://www.ohiofreedom.com/forum/showpost.php?p=2777&postcount=4

 

[brandon]

Sorry, I cant see an atheist supporting the CP. That makes no sense whatsoever.

But then again, I guess McCain got the majority of the Republican anti war vote.

We live in a crazy world....

 

[electronicmaji]

Not Baldwin. He equates homosexuality with Pedophilia.

I'm voting for Obama.

 

[newbitech]

Actually, read my signature

how do you rationalize writing Dr. Paul in when Dr. Paul said that doing so would be unproductive?

I don't know if I could make a principled vote for any of the candidates. I am having a very difficult time figuring out what to do with my vote. I will consider going fishing, but I don't think I would be doing the right thing.

 

[pinkmandy]

It doesn't matter- the cats can't be herded. Vote for whichever you like as neither can win. I'm just happy that McCain and Obama aren't getting our votes!

 

[Fox McCloud]

I'm voting for Obama.

Then, um, why are you here?

Either way, I'll still likely write-in Ron Paul's name....however, if I change my mind...

Baldwin, definitely--Barr's voting record is repulsive to me.

Plus, doesn't anyone remember the thread where someone personally met Barr, who then basically insulted Paul by saying he was a terrible speaker who had good ideals, and that that particular individual should vote for Ron Paul instead of him--doesn't anyone remember that? Talk about prideful (one of the reasons I love Ron; he's so humble).

Plus, he's not stressing the importance of abolishing the Fed like Paul and Chuck are---and that's my #1 issue (heck, even when I was a neocon, albeit rapidly fading one, that was very very important to me).

 

[OptionsTrader]

Sorry, I cant see an atheist supporting the CP.

I am and I will. Crazy world indeed.

 

[QCB79]

neither

 

[WRellim]

I am and I will. Crazy world indeed.

No crazier than a bunch of Libertarians picking two neocons as their candidates.

 

[JRegs85]

Baldwin. Barr should have endorsed Ron Paul early in the process, an endorsement from a well-known conservative would have greatly helped Dr. Paul.

 

[amy31416]

Sorry, I cant see an atheist supporting the CP. That makes no sense whatsoever.

Though I describe myself as agnostic, I am more comfortable with the CP than the LP. Party doesn't matter to me though, character does--and I'm more convinced that Baldwin has better character than Barr.

 

[Theocrat]

Pacified Libertinism

The CP wants too much religion in government.
Look on the front page of their website.

Aw, what's the matter? Are you afraid the Constitution Party is going to take away all your child porn, death clinics (AKA abortion mills), and diseased prostitutes? Poor wittle baby...

 

[pcosmar]

Aw, what's the matter? Are you afraid the Constitution Party is going to take away all your child porn, death clinics (AKA abortion mills), and diseased prostitutes? Poor wittle baby...

Actually, as a Christian I am concerned that more bad law and more restrictive measures would worsen those things. I think more could be done through education and example than force.
I am also concerned of the backlash that it would cause down the road.

I have not decided yet, but I may support Baldwin in the end, But I am uncomfortable with the positions of the "constitution" party.