Latest national polling has Trump leading in all 7 "swing" states

[Anti Federalist]

https://twitter.com/IAPolls2022/status/1762438801954136484

https://twitter.com/IAPolls2022/status/1762441969752580332

 

[Origanalist]

Nothing that vote harvesting and outright blatant cheating can't overcome.

 

[Anti Federalist]

Nothing that vote harvesting and outright blatant cheating can't overcome.

That's a big ten roger.

 

[spudea]

quick another PLANDEMIC

 

[Anti Globalist]

Again who cares? Trump's never going to be president again no matter what convoluted BS people come up with. He's clearly in league with the Deep State to destroy this country. People can either accept that now or wait until November next year to move on.

 

[spudea]

Again who cares? Trump's never going to be president again no matter what convoluted BS people come up with. He's clearly in league with the Deep State to destroy this country. People can either accept that now or wait until November next year to move on.

I want to see what they're truly capable of, I want to see them literally burn the constitution to ashes to keep trump from winning.

 

[Snowball]

I want to see what they're truly capable of, I want to see them literally burn the constitution to ashes to keep trump from winning.

What do you mean? The Constitution is WHY we are in this condition. States run their own elections. Congress changed Electoral Count laws.
All done constitutionally. They aren't burning the Constitution. They are EMPLOYING it.

Now, I don't like the way they are employing it anymore than you do, but it's legal. Since we don't like that, we are only free in the respects granted in the Constitution. That is, we have the right to choose from among their pre-selected representative choices. To represent us, as if we were criminals. And if our selection doesn't "win", we can try again after some years. It's really awesome, isn't it?

 

[acptulsa]

What do you mean? The Constitution is WHY we are in this condition.

Then why didn't "we" get in this condition 200 years ago?

 

[Snowball]

Then why didn't "we" get in this condition 200 years ago?

Because there were a lot less people, a lot more land, and less infrastructure/technology.

 

[acptulsa]

Because there were a lot less people, a lot more land, and less infrastructure/technology.

Either that, or we got here not by obeying the Constitution, but by disregarding it.

If you want to change my mind, stop repeating yourself and spell out the nuts and bolts of how your theory works. Democratic Underground is the place for mindlessly repeating mere slogans.

 

[Snowball]

Either that, or we got here not by obeying the Constitution, but by disregarding it.

If you want to change my mind, stop repeating yourself and spell out the nuts and bolts of how your theory works. Democratic Underground is the place for mindlessly repeating mere slogans.

I've posted many lengthy posts about this here over the years. But all you really have to consider is that the Constitution is still in force, still being followed, and really IS a living, breathing document, subject to the interpretations and adjustments of the duly-elected representatives and their appointed office holders.

 

[acptulsa]

I've posted many lengthy posts about this here over the years. But all you really have to consider is that the Constitution is still in force, still being followed, and really IS a living, breathing document, subject to the interpretations and adjustments of the duly-elected representatives and their appointed office holders.

Like I said, we got here by disregarding it, not by following it.

 

[Snowball]

Like I said, we got here by disregarding it, not by following it.

That's only your opinion. What are your recourses in such a situation?

 

[acptulsa]

That's only your opinion.

The document says what it says. All that other stuff is excuses for subverting it.

What you said is your opinion. Since you won't or can't back it up, I'm perfectly willing to agree to disagree.

 

[Snowball]

The document says what it says. All that other stuff is excuses for subverting it.

What you said is your opinion. Since you won't or can't back it up, I'm perfectly willing to agree to disagree.

Our REALITY is me backing it up. It is self-evident. It is MANIFEST.

 

[acptulsa]

Either that, or we got here not by obeying the Constitution, but by disregarding it.

Our REALITY is me backing it up. It is self-evident. It is MANIFEST.

Reality does not in any way refute what I said.

 

[Invisible Man]

That assumes his opponent will be Biden, which is a big if.

 

[Snowball]

Reality does not in any way refute what I said.

The Constitution says it doesn't matter what you think. It matters what your representatives and justices think.

 

[oyarde]

That assumes his opponent will be Biden, which is a big if.

true , i think they'll need to make the switch soon though , all those leads move to zero if obama gets selected

 

[Invisible Man]

true , i think they'll need to make the switch soon though , all those leads move to zero if obama gets selected

I don't see any reason for them to try to switch while primaries are still going. They don't want to have their nominee publicly campaigning against the incumbent of the same party, or the incumbent campaigning against their nominee. They want to present a unified voice to the public that looks like everybody in their party thinks Biden did a great job and everybody including Biden supports his replacement.