Matt Collins
Member
- Joined
- Jun 9, 2007
- Messages
- 47,707
You need to read the 4th Amendment: https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/amendment-4/I agree with Amash's position, and I agree with him about the seriousness of this.
However, his claim that the Constitution requires a warrant, is simply factually false. The Constitution nowhere says that.
Amash is a loser and one of the dumbest people to wear the libertarian moniker. In today's hearing, the discussion was about intelligence gathering and the relevant case law. No court has ruled a warrant is required for the programs discussed. If amash wants to change that then win a court injunction, but he can't because all he knows is how to do is be a loser.
Yes he has TDS and has shown a gross lack of strategic manuvering. But he is correct here because...Amash is a loser and one of the dumbest people to wear the libertarian moniker.
it doesn't need to be because the 4th Amendment requires it already.No court has ruled a warrant is required for the programs discussed.
So Trumps FBI pick supports the NSA spying.
His NDI pick supports assassination of Soleimani and doesn't think Snowden deserves clemency.
His HHS pick believes that Warp Speed was good and is pro-vaccine.
...and people who still support these people think they are only lying to "get in power" where all the political pressure and compromises magically disappear.
...because they definitely were genuine when they were telling us these things before they joined Trump and would never lie to us. They're just lying to the deep state to get in power where they'll do a 180 and turn on the deep state they've compromised with.
Just trying to make sure I'm keeping up.
Its almost like after election once you get in, you become part of the swamp and you go against it.
Yes he has TDS and has shown a gross lack of strategic manuvering. But he is correct here because...
it doesn't need to be because the 4th Amendment requires it already.
How about we listen to Mike Lee instead of Loser Amash.
Amash is a loser and one of the dumbest people to wear the libertarian moniker. In today's hearing, the discussion was about intelligence gathering and the relevant case law. No court has ruled a warrant is required for the programs discussed. If amash wants to change that then win a court injunction, but he can't because all he knows is how to do is be a loser.
Dude most of the forum thinks you shouldn't need to a warrant to inspect womens genitals.
Without bodily autonomy what is left?
You need to read the 4th Amendment: https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/amendment-4/
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
Here is what the 4th Amendment says. Let's look at it together.
If you can see anywhere in there that it says that a warrant is required to search the communications of Americans, or for that matter, anywhere that it mentions anything at all that the government is not permitted to do without a warrant, then please point that out. Because it plainly does not.