• Welcome to our new home!

    Please share any thoughts or issues here.


Intel Official: Say Goodbye to Privacy

FrankRep

Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2007
Messages
28,885
Intel Official: Say Goodbye to Privacy

AP
Nov 11, 2007


http://apnews.myway.com/article/20071111/D8SRJ1DO0.html


WASHINGTON (AP) - A top intelligence official says it is time people in the United States changed their definition of privacy.

Privacy no longer can mean anonymity, says Donald Kerr, the principal deputy director of national intelligence. Instead, it should mean that government and businesses properly safeguards people's private communications and financial information.

Kerr's comments come as Congress is taking a second look at the Foreign Surveillance Intelligence Act.

Lawmakers hastily changed the 1978 law last summer to allow the government to eavesdrop inside the United States without court permission, so long as one end of the conversation was reasonably believed to be located outside the U.S.

The original law required a court order for any surveillance conducted on U.S. soil, to protect Americans' privacy. The White House argued that the law was obstructing intelligence gathering.

The most contentious issue in the new legislation is whether to shield telecommunications companies from civil lawsuits for allegedly giving the government access to people's private e-mails and phone calls without a court order between 2001 and 2007.

Some lawmakers, including members of the Senate Judiciary Committee, appear reluctant to grant immunity. Suits might be the only way to determine how far the government has burrowed into people's privacy without court permission.

The committee is expected to decide this week whether its version of the bill will protect telecommunications companies.

The central witness in a California lawsuit against AT&T says the government is vacuuming up billions of e-mails and phone calls as they pass through an AT&T switching station in San Francisco.

Mark Klein, a retired AT&T technician, helped connect a device in 2003 that he says diverted and copied onto a government supercomputer every call, e-mail, and Internet site access on AT&T lines.



http://apnews.myway.com/article/20071111/D8SRJ1DO0.html
 
Last edited:
Yeah, I saw this today, and this is ridiculous...this and the National I.D. card need to be top priorities while we are campaigning...
 
that government and businesses properly safeguards people's private communications and financial information.



If that's not a reason to vote for Ron Paul I don't know what else is. Do you want the governmentto guarantee your privacy or yourself?
 
Someone go give this to that nutjob moderator over at Hannity forums. I want to see him sell out his country by supporting this absolute tragedy.
 
I am sure the jackass over at sean hannity would love this.
Since i know for a fact they love intel and they are a true bush worshipping clut >.>
they wont even care if the dollar is low or not.
 
Privacy [...]should mean that government and businesses properly safeguards people's private communications and financial information.

So in new-speak, privacy now means having all of your information exposed to government and the highest bidder. Privacy now means total exposure. Oh yeah, and war is peace, slavery is freedom, etc.
 
Mr. Kerr's definition of privacy is the absolute opposite of the true definition of privacy!

The definition of privacy is:

PRI'VACY, n. [form private.] A state of being in retirement from the company or observation of others; secrecy.
1. A place of seclusion from company or observation; retreat; solitude; retirement.


Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect every one who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are inevitably ruined.
~ Patrick Henry, 1778
 
Back
Top