Wickwire
Member
- Joined
- Nov 8, 2007
- Messages
- 172
I just read an article, published yesterday, Nov. 13, which was about Huckabee's sudden climb in the Iowa polls. There was no mention of Ron Paul. At the end of the article was the following statement:
"CBS News and The New York Times conducted telephone interviews with 1273 likely caucus-goers in Iowa November 2-11, 2007 and 719 likely primary voters in New Hampshire November 9-12, 2007."
I was wondering... how many of you actually have a land line? My only phone has been a cell phone for quite some time.
How many of you have ever been polled? I'm 27, and have never been polled in one of these surveys. I also believe that Ron Paul's message has redefined the typical "likely voter" this election cycle, given the fact that many of his supporters have never been involved in politics or supported a campaign before.
Given the outdated method of polling, I believe that they are missing a significant portion of the potential voter demographic, a large portion of which will be voting for Ron Paul. I would not be surprised if Ron Paul wins in Iowa and New Hampshire, further baffling the so-called "experts".
"CBS News and The New York Times conducted telephone interviews with 1273 likely caucus-goers in Iowa November 2-11, 2007 and 719 likely primary voters in New Hampshire November 9-12, 2007."
I was wondering... how many of you actually have a land line? My only phone has been a cell phone for quite some time.
How many of you have ever been polled? I'm 27, and have never been polled in one of these surveys. I also believe that Ron Paul's message has redefined the typical "likely voter" this election cycle, given the fact that many of his supporters have never been involved in politics or supported a campaign before.
Given the outdated method of polling, I believe that they are missing a significant portion of the potential voter demographic, a large portion of which will be voting for Ron Paul. I would not be surprised if Ron Paul wins in Iowa and New Hampshire, further baffling the so-called "experts".