smartguy911
Member
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2007
- Messages
- 2,992
God i wish Ted Poe weren't such a worthless fascist. He's at least right on this issue.
He is right on this, glad someone's making the case. Between batteries and shit like this, we are going to have so much toxic waste here, it's ridiculous.
Oh, and so much for my E-Z Bake oven.
These things don't really work like they say they're supposed to. Apparently they should last years and years yet for some reason I seem to have to replace them almost as frequently as old kind.
LED lights are the direction we should be heading.
What first light bulb?YES!!! LED's don't really burn out....well they do, but not always......good stuff. Wasn't the first light bulb a good one? Didn't it not burn out? Was it just not energy efficient?
YES!!! LED's don't really burn out....well they do, but not always......good stuff. Wasn't the first light bulb a good one? Didn't it not burn out? Was it just not energy efficient?
Yes, the early bulbs were good ones indeed. I have seen a few of them burning when I was young. They used some kind of carbon compound instead of tungsten. I don't know how well those filaments stood up to being jostled in transport, but they worked. No, they weren't efficient. They ran hot and eventually darkened the insides of their glass bulbs with the carbon. Furthermore, they didn't last forever unless you left them burning 24/7. Letting them cool then warming them back up definitely led to a more normal lifespan for them.
Seeing some of those old things after they finally burned out after decades of burning constantly was interesting. You could always tell which way they had hung because whichever side was up would be nearly black with carbon coating.
As for voltage, if you run an incandescent on less than full voltage you will get dimmer, more yellow light but the bulbs will use little electricity and will last forever.