Hillary's Public Vs. Private Positions - Deceit?

[Brian4Liberty]

Hillary's Public Vs. Private Positions - Deceit?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-U9IrnpmeAA

In a recently-leaked speech from 2013, Hillary Clinton said that it is important to take both public and private positions on each issue. Is this the language of the typical politician, or something even more deceptive? How does that explain her positions on Syria and Saudi Arabia?

 

[AZJoe]

Some of her private disclosures
http://ronpaulinstitute.org/archive...ks-the-two-faces-of-hillary-clinton-on-syria/

Recent WikiLeaks release of a June 2013 speech by Clinton:

"So, the problem for the US and the Europeans has been from the very beginning: What is it you – who is it you are going to try to arm. And you probably read in the papers my view was we should try to find some of the groups that were there that we thought we could build relationships with and develop some covert connections that might then at least give us some insight into what is going on inside Syria."
​

A WikiLeaks email sent from Hillary Clinton to her now-campaign chief John Podesta in August 2014 shows that the former Secretary of State was fully aware that her allies were partial to supporting terrorists:

"While this military/paramilitary operation is moving forward, we need to use our diplomatic and more traditional intelligence assets to bring pressure on the governments of Qatar and Saudi Arabia, which are providing clandestine financial and logistic support to ISIL and other radical Sunni groups in the region."​

.
Another October 2013 Clinton speech "flagged" by her campaign staff, and released by WikiLeaks this week, has her saying:

"The Saudis and others are shipping large amounts of weapons – and pretty indiscriminately – not at all targeted toward the people that we think would be the more moderate, least likely, to cause problems in the future."​

.
Hillary on her “no-fly zone” over Syria she is still advocating - In yet another speech ‘flagged’ by her campaign and released by WikiLeaks – this one delivered to Goldman Sachs at their CEO conference in June 2013 - Clinton explains:

"To have a no-fly zone you have to take out all of the air defense, many of which are located in populated areas. So our missiles, even if they are standoff missiles so we’re not putting our pilots at risk – you’re going to kill a lot of Syrians. So all of a sudden this intervention that people talk about so glibly becomes an American and NATO involvement where you take a lot of civilians."​

.
In 2009, a secret WikiLeaks cable signed off by then- Secretary of State Hillary Clinton reads, in part:

"Donors in Saudi Arabia constitute the most significant source of funding to Sunni terrorist groups worldwide … Saudi Arabia remains a critical financial support base for Al-Qaeda, the Taliban, LeT (Laskhar-e Taiba), and other terrorist groups"

​

http://ronpaulinstitute.org/archive...ks-the-two-faces-of-hillary-clinton-on-syria/