RP=RonPaul=RedPill
Member
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2007
- Messages
- 160
I never thought my message would go through. I wrote my message before I saw all of your wonderful messages on the illegitimacy of the polls themselves. I wrote it like that because I don't think that the public as a whole likes to verify facts, so I went into the direction of "just give him coverage, I can guaruntee you his poll numbers will rise." I missed one very important adjective - rigged. As in rigged polls. His numbers would rise in the rigged polls. They have so far. Imagine how much he ACTUALLY rises? There are too many of us to suppress the number to only 1-2%. It would completely discredit the polling companies.
I am almost certian Ron Paul's real support is what the polls say PLUS the margin of error. So if the margin of error is +/- 5%, for example. If Ron Paul's support is , say 7% at Rasmussan. Add 5 to that so Rasmussan isn't discredited and you get Ron Paul's real support at 12%. This is enough to win the nomination as long as we have strong voter turnout (we will) and delegates. We have somewhere in the neighborhood of 36 million supporters. Even without the margin of error, we still have somewhere in the neighborhood of 21 million supporters. Bill Clinton won the '92 nomination with 20 million votes. (Mind you, if the real number was 7%, a polling company could suppress that to 2% and say there's a +/- 5% margin of error). This does not mean we should stop working hard to spread the message. Let's drive that number up to as high as we can go. So there is no doubt to who the winner is. Not all of these supporters are rabid, so be sure to make your whole family go to the polls and vote for Ron Paul during your primary. But I digress.
I sorta feel used by the CNN.
I don't like to be used to spread propaganda (using me to say polls are legitimate end all, be all, when they aren't you know what I mean). A lot of people have been rightfully saying that the Cafferty file left out all of the messages on the illegitimacy of the polls. I might have waited too long to post this message, as I joined this forum on the Tea Party.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=BibN0cB9v3I
I am almost certian Ron Paul's real support is what the polls say PLUS the margin of error. So if the margin of error is +/- 5%, for example. If Ron Paul's support is , say 7% at Rasmussan. Add 5 to that so Rasmussan isn't discredited and you get Ron Paul's real support at 12%. This is enough to win the nomination as long as we have strong voter turnout (we will) and delegates. We have somewhere in the neighborhood of 36 million supporters. Even without the margin of error, we still have somewhere in the neighborhood of 21 million supporters. Bill Clinton won the '92 nomination with 20 million votes. (Mind you, if the real number was 7%, a polling company could suppress that to 2% and say there's a +/- 5% margin of error). This does not mean we should stop working hard to spread the message. Let's drive that number up to as high as we can go. So there is no doubt to who the winner is. Not all of these supporters are rabid, so be sure to make your whole family go to the polls and vote for Ron Paul during your primary. But I digress.
I sorta feel used by the CNN.
I don't like to be used to spread propaganda (using me to say polls are legitimate end all, be all, when they aren't you know what I mean). A lot of people have been rightfully saying that the Cafferty file left out all of the messages on the illegitimacy of the polls. I might have waited too long to post this message, as I joined this forum on the Tea Party.http://youtube.com/watch?v=BibN0cB9v3I
Last edited:
