Gay Lover Spat? SF Police Have Bodycam Footage, Would Show if Attacker Was in Underwear

[James_Madison_Lives]

Let's see a Berkeley nudist who lived in a commune with LGBT and BLM flags. Police charging Depape with "elder abuse" which means they would know each other.

Depape was in his underwear when police saw him? Now reversed. How do you get that kind of detail wrong?

I say it was a gay lover thing turned sour.

Underwear: https://twitter.com/EndWokeness/status/1586075653790904320

Man In Underwear Attacked Paul Pelosi With A Hammer | KFI AM 640 (iheart.com)


Pelosi Attack Suspect Was A Psychotic Homeless Addict Estranged From His Pedophile Lover & Their Children​

"And, as I discovered yesterday, DePape lived with a notorious local nudist in a Berkeley home, complete with a Black Lives Matter sign in the window and an LGBT rainbow flag, emblazoned with a marijuana symbol, hanging from a tree. A closer look reveals the characteristics of a homeless encampment, or what Europeans call “an open drug scene.” In the driveway, there is a broken-down camper van. On the street is a yellow school bus, which neighbors said DePape occasionally stayed in. Both are filled with garbage typical of such structures in homeless encampments. People come and go from the house and the vehicles, neighbors say, in part to partake in the use of a potent psychedelic drug, ibogaine."


David DePape ID’d as hammer-wielding intruder who attacked Paul Pelosi​

"Scott also said DePape has been booked on charges of attempted homicide, assault with a deadly weapon, elder abuse, burglary, and “several other additional felonies.”"

Paul Pelosi spoke in code to alert 911 operator of hammer attacker: report​

"As officers arrived at the scene, Pelosi, 82, attempted to grab the hammer out of DePape’s hands. DePape allegedly hit Pelosi over the head with the weapon in the scuffle that was caught on police bodycam."




Something "off" about this entrance site. Wrong door is open, could not reach over that far, the door set with the broken glass should be the one open.

 

[devil21]

Yep, Ed Buck type stuff. I don't particularly care if Pelosi likes men or whatever but the cover up, obvious nonsense trying to frame it as a MAGA event, and the overall level of degeneracy our "leaders" have stooped to is beyond the pale at this point.

 

[Snowball]

DePape is not gay, neither is Paul Pelosi.
Wearing underwear at 2:30 AM when you are going to crash because you're loaded to the gills doesn't make the owner of that house gay, either.
What looks the most likely is DePape flipped out when he discovered it was Nancy Pelosi's house.

 

[acptulsa]

DePape is not gay, neither is Paul Pelosi.
Wearing underwear at 2:30 AM when you are going to crash because you're loaded to the gills doesn't make the owner of that house gay, either.
What looks the most likely is DePape flipped out when he discovered it was Nancy Pelosi's house.

How did he get anywhere near the Speaker of the House's back door?

What's up, dude? When it comes to asinine conspiracy theories like nuclear warheads in skyscrapers, you're on it like a Rottweiler on a raw steak. Here's something that's more than plausible, and suddenly you're the deep denier.

Interesting about face...

 

[Brian4Liberty]

How did he get anywhere near the Speaker of the House's back door?

JFK had no problem.

 

[Snowball]

How did he get anywhere near the Speaker of the House's back door?

What's up, dude? When it comes to asinine conspiracy theories like nuclear warheads in skyscrapers, you're on it like a Rottweiler on a raw steak. Here's something that's more than plausible, and suddenly you're the deep denier.

Interesting about face...

There's just no reason for it. Neither man has any gay history. The gay stuff online is made up by unserious quippers.
Drugs and Booze and 2:30 AM make for bad happenings. The official story is getting plausible. Reasons to protect identity of 3rd person are legit, also.

 

[ClaytonB]

How did he get anywhere near the Speaker of the House's back door?

^^^ THIS

SotH is 2nd in line to POTUS after VP, has a dedicated Capitol Police protection detail equivalent to the SS. One way or the other, it looks like the Capitol Police have been clowned yet again...

 

[acptulsa]

^^^ THIS

SotH is 2nd in line to POTUS after VP, has a dedicated Capitol Police protection detail equivalent to the SS. One way or the other, it looks like the Capitol Police have been clowned yet again...

Or not. The Speaker was three thousand miles away. If the other resident invited a guest in, saying no was not in their job description.

 

[Occam's Banana]

JFK had no problem.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bcYppAs6ZdI

 

[acptulsa]

JFK had no problem.

 

[SpiritOf1776_J4]

DePape is not gay, neither is Paul Pelosi.
Wearing underwear at 2:30 AM when you are going to crash because you're loaded to the gills doesn't make the owner of that house gay, either.
What looks the most likely is DePape flipped out when he discovered it was Nancy Pelosi's house.

That, and when Polosi brought out the spirit cooking pictures when asked what his favorite positions were.

 

[Sonny Tufts]

Police charging Depape with "elder abuse" which means they would know each other.

Guess again. The relevant California statute contains no such element. All that's required in this case is that DePape knew or should have known Pelosi was at least 65.

California Penal Code Section 368

(b)(1) A person who knows or reasonably should know that a person is an elder or dependent adult and who, under circumstances or conditions likely to produce great bodily harm or death, willfully causes or permits any elder or dependent adult to suffer, or inflicts thereon unjustifiable physical pain or mental suffering, or having the care or custody of any elder or dependent adult, willfully causes or permits the person or health of the elder or dependent adult to be injured, or willfully causes or permits the elder or dependent adult to be placed in a situation in which his or her person or health is endangered, is punishable by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding one year, or by a fine not to exceed six thousand dollars ($6,000), or by both that fine and imprisonment, or by imprisonment in the state prison for two, three, or four years.

(2) If, in the commission of an offense described in paragraph (1), the victim suffers great bodily injury, as defined in Section 12022.7, the defendant shall receive an additional term in the state prison as follows:

(A) Three years if the victim is under 70 years of age.

(B) Five years if the victim is 70 years of age or older.

(g) As used in this section, “elder” means a person who is 65 years of age or older.

 

[acptulsa]

Guess again. The relevant California statute contains no such element.

It certainly looks like it has such an element. It isn't enough to prevent the statute from being applied in this case. But if what you pasted is the statute in question, "contains no such element" is a lie.

If you didn't post to set the record straight, why did you?

 

[Sonny Tufts]

It certainly looks like it has such an element. It isn't enough to prevent the statute from being applied in this case. But if what you pasted is the statute in question, "contains no such element" is a lie

I was contrasting the applicable statute with the definition (supposedly from the Worl;d Health Organization) that was in the OP, which is irrelevant. I should have said the Califormia law doesn't contain "relationship where there is an expectation of trust" as a necessary element. It's obvious that charging DePape with elder abuse wouldn't mean he knew Pelosi.

 

[69360]

So why was a Canadian citizen going after a US politician?