werdd Member Joined Sep 29, 2007 Messages 3,452 Sep 28, 2008 #1 That would be a hell of a move. Of course whoever did it, would take the full blame of the collapse of our economy.
That would be a hell of a move. Of course whoever did it, would take the full blame of the collapse of our economy.
DFF Banned Joined Jan 13, 2008 Messages 3,348 Sep 28, 2008 #2 LOL...yeah, but I don't think this will happen. We'd have a rough year...maybe a little longer...but we'd recover.
LOL...yeah, but I don't think this will happen. We'd have a rough year...maybe a little longer...but we'd recover.
T tggroo7 Member Joined Nov 30, 2007 Messages 284 Sep 28, 2008 #3 EDIT: nevermind, lol Last edited: Sep 28, 2008
DFF Banned Joined Jan 13, 2008 Messages 3,348 Sep 28, 2008 #4 Correct me if I'm wrong, but only a Senator can filibuster.
P psalm82x3 Member Joined Dec 23, 2007 Messages 170 Sep 28, 2008 #6 Senator Bunning would be the man to do it. I heard him on the radio the other day denouncing the bailout, and I emailed his office with thanks.
Senator Bunning would be the man to do it. I heard him on the radio the other day denouncing the bailout, and I emailed his office with thanks.
DFF Banned Joined Jan 13, 2008 Messages 3,348 Sep 28, 2008 #7 Did he say anything about a potential filibuster? If so, we need to try and get in touch with him - and any other anti-bailout senators - immediately!
Did he say anything about a potential filibuster? If so, we need to try and get in touch with him - and any other anti-bailout senators - immediately!
F freelance Member Joined Jul 15, 2007 Messages 4,412 Sep 28, 2008 #8 Probably not enough no votes in the Senate to filibuster.
DFF Banned Joined Jan 13, 2008 Messages 3,348 Sep 28, 2008 #9 freelance said: Probably not enough no votes in the Senate to filibuster. Click to expand... 3/5's of the senators would have to be against it; and if preliminary votes of the motion on Friday are any indication, I don't think this will be the case. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filibuster <---- Scroll down to "United States."
freelance said: Probably not enough no votes in the Senate to filibuster. Click to expand... 3/5's of the senators would have to be against it; and if preliminary votes of the motion on Friday are any indication, I don't think this will be the case. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filibuster <---- Scroll down to "United States."