wizardwatson
Member
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2007
- Messages
- 7,703
This article at cnn contains plenty o' fear mongering.
http://money.cnn.com/2008/09/22/markets/thebuzz/?postversion=2008092211
My favorite part is how they say that 10% of the job market could be affected by failures in the financial industry.
This is absurd. Not the numbers, but the insinuation. If jobs are created from false premises, then they should be eliminated. This is the same argument that people use against shrinking government, we'll lose jobs.
Fuck those jobs!! Let the market allocate the jobs. If we have bloat in a sector, those resources need to be reallocated. Why don't they just sloganeer "Vote for the bailout! Save a bureaucrat!!"
We got almost as many shiny, marble banks in this country as we do churches.
My basic point is this:
Arguing that failing sectors need to be propped up to preserve the status quo and save jobs is ludicrous. This is worshipping malinvestment, and only keeps huge unproductive sectors in the economy (read: government and cronies) solvent to the benefit of those actors the market has shown to be undeserving of solvency.
http://money.cnn.com/2008/09/22/markets/thebuzz/?postversion=2008092211
My favorite part is how they say that 10% of the job market could be affected by failures in the financial industry.
This is absurd. Not the numbers, but the insinuation. If jobs are created from false premises, then they should be eliminated. This is the same argument that people use against shrinking government, we'll lose jobs.
Fuck those jobs!! Let the market allocate the jobs. If we have bloat in a sector, those resources need to be reallocated. Why don't they just sloganeer "Vote for the bailout! Save a bureaucrat!!"
We got almost as many shiny, marble banks in this country as we do churches.
My basic point is this:
Arguing that failing sectors need to be propped up to preserve the status quo and save jobs is ludicrous. This is worshipping malinvestment, and only keeps huge unproductive sectors in the economy (read: government and cronies) solvent to the benefit of those actors the market has shown to be undeserving of solvency.