• Welcome to our new home!

    Please share any thoughts or issues here.


DIGG-McCain's vulnerability in the YouTube era

Chomsky

Member
Joined
Nov 9, 2007
Messages
812
h ttp://digg.com/politics/Presidential_Politics_in_the_YouTube_Era

I have a feeling those town hall meetings could be his downfall if he is not careful...I sure hope so.
 
If the difference in Ron Paul's online popularity and his actual vote totals have shown us one thing it is that people are NOT getting their information from YouTube, or the internet in general before voting.

And quite frankly...I am very happy that people are not going to YouTube to get their information on anything important. It is nothing but cute kitties, or obviously one sided agenda pieces.
 
And quite frankly...I am very happy that people are not going to YouTube to get their information on anything important. It is nothing but cute kitties, or obviously one sided agenda pieces.

................................ hmm.
 
And quite frankly...I am very happy that people are not going to YouTube to get their information on anything important. It is nothing but cute kitties, or obviously one sided agenda pieces.

I personally think above is incorrect. I have seen vidoes that the news stations air a clip from and make comments then you go to youtube watch the whole video and find out the news anchors have completly lied to the people watching about said video so not sure what kitties you are watching
 
I personally think above is incorrect. I have seen vidoes that the news stations air a clip from and make comments then you go to youtube watch the whole video and find out the news anchors have completly lied to the people watching about said video so not sure what kitties you are watching

Rev. Wrights comments is a perfect example of that!
 
And quite frankly...I am very happy that people are not going to YouTube to get their information on anything important. It is nothing but cute kitties, or obviously one sided agenda pieces.

Yes I agree, and wikipedia is just written by a bunch of people, unlike The Encyclopedia Britannica which is delivered to us yearly by Zeus.

News organizations do a much better job of avoiding cutesy human interest stories and bias and get right to the facts. Imagine if we accepted the word of someone who wasn't hired by a corporation as fact!

Ok, sorry for the flaming, I realize you are new.
 
Back
Top