It occurred to me that there may be some who might wonder about the persistent
label applied to various members of the rEVOLution as well as our candidate.
This label arises when someone is intellectually challenged by the concept of principles.
In venue after venue the same response is visible:
The people who continuously denigrate Ron Paul and the grassroots
through the use of these labels have a single point in common:
They are incapable of comprehension.
It is not that they have not heard every aspect of the message,
it is simply that they lack the intellectual horsepower to digest the message.
One key component absent in their lexicon is 'principle'.
They don't get 'principle'. It is a vast mysterious universe to those people.
They don't understand how action A causes event B based on principle.
This obstacle leads them into a mental storm of confusion,
out of which they find the vacuous nonsense other candidates spout
as being fatherly and reassuring.
This is a litmus test against which they have no defense.
Knowing this, their weakness lies exposed and ripe for the attack.
The opposition is universally absent of principle.
This should be exposed for what it is - defective government education.
Of all the groups remaining to be recruited to the Ron Paul rEVOLution,
the religious right should be high on the list given their leaders
exhortations to principles disguised as morality.
For the non-religious, it is only a matter of logic.
A candidate without principle is like a rudderless ship in the storm,
even more dangerous without principle based upon the Constitution.
When you encounter the 'crazy' label, lower your IQ and speak as to
a more 'juvenile' mentality - this is what network news has done for decades.
That the average Ron Paul supporter is far more intelligent than the masses
is obvious to everyone - we just need to use our brains at a lower gear ratio.
label applied to various members of the rEVOLution as well as our candidate.
This label arises when someone is intellectually challenged by the concept of principles.
In venue after venue the same response is visible:
The people who continuously denigrate Ron Paul and the grassroots
through the use of these labels have a single point in common:
They are incapable of comprehension.
It is not that they have not heard every aspect of the message,
it is simply that they lack the intellectual horsepower to digest the message.
One key component absent in their lexicon is 'principle'.
They don't get 'principle'. It is a vast mysterious universe to those people.
They don't understand how action A causes event B based on principle.
This obstacle leads them into a mental storm of confusion,
out of which they find the vacuous nonsense other candidates spout
as being fatherly and reassuring.
This is a litmus test against which they have no defense.
Knowing this, their weakness lies exposed and ripe for the attack.
The opposition is universally absent of principle.
This should be exposed for what it is - defective government education.
Of all the groups remaining to be recruited to the Ron Paul rEVOLution,
the religious right should be high on the list given their leaders
exhortations to principles disguised as morality.
For the non-religious, it is only a matter of logic.
A candidate without principle is like a rudderless ship in the storm,
even more dangerous without principle based upon the Constitution.
When you encounter the 'crazy' label, lower your IQ and speak as to
a more 'juvenile' mentality - this is what network news has done for decades.
That the average Ron Paul supporter is far more intelligent than the masses
is obvious to everyone - we just need to use our brains at a lower gear ratio.
)
