• Welcome to our new home!

    Please share any thoughts or issues here.


CPAC dis-invites Mitt(ens) Romney after his impeachment vote.

eleganz

Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2007
Messages
8,262
In another thread I posed the question, what did Mitt gain by being one of only two (and the only one from a conservative state) to vote to bring witnesses in the impeachment vote? Doing that only invites trouble with zero upside.

What is he trying to prove.

Who is he trying to impress.

Who has dirt on him (this is least likely IMO).


CPAC no longer allowing him to attend their annual meetings somewhat surprised me. But I guess he is free from Trump screwing with his re-election since he will have to run for again only when Trump's second term is already done with.



CPAC says Mitt Romney not welcome at annual confab after his impeachment trial vote
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/jan/31/cpac-says-mitt-romney-not-welcome-annual-confab-af/

The Conservative Political Action Committee formally disinvited the Utah Republican from its high-profile conference next month, after he voted in favor of new witnesses in President Trump’s impeachment trial.

“BREAKING: The ‘extreme conservative’ and Junior Senator from the great state of Utah, @SenatorRomney is formally NOT invited to #CPAC2020,” tweeted Matt Schlapp, chairman of the American Conservative Union.
 
In another thread I posed the question, what did Mitt gain by being one of only two (and the only one from a conservative state) to vote to bring witnesses in the impeachment vote? Doing that only invites trouble with zero upside.

What is he trying to prove.

Who is he trying to impress.

Who has dirt on him (this is least likely IMO).
You missed the most likely explanation.
He is involved with the corruption in Ukraine and wants to do everything he can to try to stop Trump from exposing it.
 
You missed the most likely explanation.
He is involved with the corruption in Ukraine and wants to do everything he can to try to stop Trump from exposing it.

If he was involved, he would prefer to end the impeachment process quickly.

I think that explanation is very unlikely.

Romney was essentially the "Dr. No" of the GOP for this specific vote. He put the target on his own back. Collins will get away with her vote very easily.
 
If he was involved, he would prefer to end the impeachment process quickly.

I think that explanation is very unlikely.

Romney was essentially the "Dr. No" of the GOP for this specific vote. He put the target on his own back. Collins will get away with her vote very easily.
He wants to drag out the impeachment for as long as possible because they can keep Trump from pursuing the Ukraine corruption as long as the impeachment is going on and it gives them more time to create another impeachment to tie him up.

They want to keep him tied up until the election in the hope that he will lose.
 
You missed the most likely explanation.
He is involved with the corruption in Ukraine and wants to do everything he can to try to stop Trump from exposing it.

If he is involved in the corruption then he would prefer the whole issue end asap instead of prolonging it. And if you know this, then is really no need for a cover up. He is doomed because if a nobody on the internet knows it, then the DOJ knows this too and they will come after him.

I will take back my word if he gets investigated for the corruption.
 
He wants to drag out the impeachment for as long as possible because they can keep Trump from pursuing the Ukraine corruption as long as the impeachment is going on and it gives them more time to create another impeachment to tie him up.

They want to keep him tied up until the election in the hope that he will lose.

The investigation is done, the foreign aid money has been released, you make it seem like Trump or anyone in the Ukraine is still investigating this crime.
 
The investigation is done, the foreign aid money has been released, you make it seem like Trump or anyone in the Ukraine is still investigating this crime.
Trump is investigating BIDEN'S crime and many others taking place in Ukraine.
 
Suit for sale.

^^^this^^^

I think he's setting himself up for 2024 (only four years away) possibly laying down a track record he can fall back on. Picture this, if he was a candidate now, what kind of candidate would he be and who would he need votes from? Dems who want Trump impeached. He can say he voted for witnesses.
 
Last edited:
Romney/Bloomberg 2024

It would be the greatest crossover since:

The-Ugliest-Crossovers-and-SUVs-Ever-Made-gear-patrol-Pontiac-Aztek.jpg


RuPaul-Jeopardy.jpg


90
 
In another thread I posed the question, what did Mitt gain by being one of only two (and the only one from a conservative state) to vote to bring witnesses in the impeachment vote? Doing that only invites trouble with zero upside.

What is he trying to prove.

Who is he trying to impress.

Who has dirt on him (this is least likely IMO).


CPAC no longer allowing him to attend their annual meetings somewhat surprised me. But I guess he is free from Trump screwing with his re-election since he will have to run for again only when Trump's second term is already done with.



CPAC says Mitt Romney not welcome at annual confab after his impeachment trial vote
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/jan/31/cpac-says-mitt-romney-not-welcome-annual-confab-af/


 
Maybe, but there are a few million Mormons in Utah who are a hell of a lot better than Romney.

disHonorable mention for Willard's peer group would be all of the Huntsmans, Dirty Harry Reid, and of course Glenn Beck.

Question for Swordsmith:

I'm not Roman Catholic, but I do know that when your priest becomes aware of your personal behavior that is way off base from decency, they will deny you communion. Word on the street is that Pelosi hasn't received communion for years for this reason, although with as corrupt as the RC church is now, it probably wouldn't be hard to go priest-shopping for a commie (Francis) who would do it.

Question: Do the Mormons have a similar method to reign in bad actors? It seems that most denominations turn a blind eye to their members of influence.
 
Back
Top