eleganz
Member
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2007
- Messages
- 8,262
In another thread I posed the question, what did Mitt gain by being one of only two (and the only one from a conservative state) to vote to bring witnesses in the impeachment vote? Doing that only invites trouble with zero upside.
What is he trying to prove.
Who is he trying to impress.
Who has dirt on him (this is least likely IMO).
CPAC no longer allowing him to attend their annual meetings somewhat surprised me. But I guess he is free from Trump screwing with his re-election since he will have to run for again only when Trump's second term is already done with.
CPAC says Mitt Romney not welcome at annual confab after his impeachment trial vote
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/jan/31/cpac-says-mitt-romney-not-welcome-annual-confab-af/
What is he trying to prove.
Who is he trying to impress.
Who has dirt on him (this is least likely IMO).
CPAC no longer allowing him to attend their annual meetings somewhat surprised me. But I guess he is free from Trump screwing with his re-election since he will have to run for again only when Trump's second term is already done with.
CPAC says Mitt Romney not welcome at annual confab after his impeachment trial vote
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/jan/31/cpac-says-mitt-romney-not-welcome-annual-confab-af/
The Conservative Political Action Committee formally disinvited the Utah Republican from its high-profile conference next month, after he voted in favor of new witnesses in President Trump’s impeachment trial.
“BREAKING: The ‘extreme conservative’ and Junior Senator from the great state of Utah, @SenatorRomney is formally NOT invited to #CPAC2020,” tweeted Matt Schlapp, chairman of the American Conservative Union.