Censorship Outcry Thread

[CaptUSA]

Please use this thread to post reaction from around the world on Big Tech's purge of opinions.

I'll start.

Germany’s Merkel hits out at Twitter over ‘problematic’ Trump ban
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/01/11/germanys-merkel-hits-out-at-twitter-over-problematic-trump-ban.html

LONDON — German Chancellor Angela Merkel blasted Twitter’s decision to ban U.S. President Donald Trump.

“The right to freedom of opinion is of fundamental importance,” Steffen Seibert, Merkel’s chief spokesman, told reporters in Berlin on Monday, according to Reuters.

“Given that, the chancellor considers it problematic that the president’s accounts have been permanently suspended.”

Seibert said that, while Twitter was right to flag Trump’s inaccurate tweets about the 2020 U.S. election, banning his account altogether was a step too far. He added that governments, not private companies, should decide on any limitations to freedom of speech.

 

[CaptUSA]

Tulsi Gabbard

 

[CaptUSA]

Australia

 

[Aratus]

There are the times when censorship is heavy handed.
However, with the vote in the HOUSE looming, being off
of Twitter like that is not the worst of this for our POTUS.

 

[DamianTV]

The ONLY reason that they are going FULL SCALE with their Censorship Ministry of Truth machine is because they KNOW WE KNOW that the Election has been stolen. This is them hiding the evidence. We are not allowed to discuss the evidence. Ask them and they will lie thru their teeth that their is no evidence.

Censorship allows them to continue to control the narrative. And they are losing the Information War. We know. We have seen the evidence. However, we may not win in the long run as censorship is but one of most of their weapons. Remember they control the Police, Military, National Guard, and most weapons. The BIG weapons. Your Crane Style Kung Fu is no match for my 80,000 NUCLEAR FUCKING WARHEADS and this shiny little candy-like button.

 

[CaptUSA]

The ONLY reason that they are going FULL SCALE with their Censorship Ministry of Truth machine is because they KNOW WE KNOW that the Election has been stolen. This is them hiding the evidence. We are not allowed to discuss the evidence. Ask them and they will lie thru their teeth that their is no evidence.

Censorship allows them to continue to control the narrative. And they are losing the Information War. We know. We have seen the evidence. However, we may not win in the long run as censorship is but one of most of their weapons. Remember they control the Police, Military, National Guard, and most weapons. The BIG weapons. Your Crane Style Kung Fu is no match for my 80,000 NUCLEAR FUCKING WARHEADS and this shiny little candy-like button.

I mean, this is a sound conclusion to draw. I'm not sure how they think people could see it any other way. And what's more, this reaction is going to further undermine any credibility that Biden could hope to have. He'll be sworn in surrounded by armored National Guard troops and socially-distanced onlookers with their faces covered. The history books will have the asterisk by his name. We are witnessing a strange historic moment when one political party captured control of technology to install a candidate of their choosing.

I wonder if history will blame it on the virus?

 

[PAF]

The ONLY reason that they are going FULL SCALE with their Censorship Ministry of Truth machine is because they KNOW WE KNOW that the Election has been stolen. This is them hiding the evidence. We are not allowed to discuss the evidence. Ask them and they will lie thru their teeth that their is no evidence.

Censorship allows them to continue to control the narrative. And they are losing the Information War. We know. We have seen the evidence. However, we may not win in the long run as censorship is but one of most of their weapons. Remember they control the Police, Military, National Guard, and most weapons. The BIG weapons. Your Crane Style Kung Fu is no match for my 80,000 NUCLEAR $#@!ING WARHEADS and this shiny little candy-like button.

Everybody is going feel victorious and on top of the world once "voting" returns to normal.

While eyes are that way, The Great Reset is this way.

The system needs the pitted people to flap both wings.

 

[jkr]

nice 'stache chinajoe


hahaha chinajoe, i KILL me!
chinajoe! a great american traitor! chinajoe is everywherrrer!

 

[Occam's Banana]

Germany’s Merkel hits out at Twitter over ‘problematic’ Trump ban
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/01/11/germanys-merkel-hits-out-at-twitter-over-problematic-trump-ban.html

LONDON — German Chancellor Angela Merkel blasted Twitter’s decision to ban U.S. President Donald Trump.

“The right to freedom of opinion is of fundamental importance,” Steffen Seibert, Merkel’s chief spokesman, told reporters in Berlin on Monday, according to Reuters.

“Given that, the chancellor considers it problematic that the president’s accounts have been permanently suspended.”

Seibert said that, while Twitter was right to flag Trump’s inaccurate tweets about the 2020 U.S. election, banning his account altogether was a step too far. He added that governments, not private companies, should decide on any limitations to freedom of speech.

In other words, Seibert (and by extension, Merkel) doesn't have a problem with what Twitter is doing so much as he has a problem with it being done by someone other than the government. So presumably, it would be less objectionable for the U.S. government to make everyone do exactly the same thing Twitter is doing, rather than for Twitter et al. to do it on their own.

Whatever one might think about the status of Twitter, et al. as "private" entities, Seibert's sentiment is pretty much the exact opposite of the meaning and intent of the First Amendment ...

Only Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.​

 

[DamianTV]

I mean, this is a sound conclusion to draw. I'm not sure how they think people could see it any other way. And what's more, this reaction is going to further undermine any credibility that Biden could hope to have. He'll be sworn in surrounded by armored National Guard troops and socially-distanced onlookers with their faces covered. The history books will have the asterisk by his name. We are witnessing a strange historic moment when one political party captured control of technology to install a candidate of their choosing.

I wonder if history will blame it on the virus?

Wont be blamed on anything in 100 years + because they intend on writing the USA out of the History Books, permanently. Just like kids believe if its not on youtube it doesnt exist.

---

For the record, and I so want to be absolutely wrong about this, but I think as of Jan 20th, Ron Paul Forums is gonna be taken offline. Could be sooner, could be a little later, but we are THERE. This is THE END. Like I said, I want to be wrong...

 

[CaptUSA]

In other words, Seibert (and by extension, Merkel) doesn't have a problem with what Twitter is doing so much as he has a problem with it being done by someone other than the government. So presumably, it would be less objectionable for the U.S. government to make everyone do exactly the same thing Twitter is doing, rather than for Twitter et al. to do it on their own.

Whatever one might think about the status of Twitter, et al. as "private" entities, Seibert's sentiment is pretty much the exact opposite of the meaning and intent of the First Amendment ...

Only Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.​

Europeans... what do you expect?

 

[Brian4Liberty]

Please use this thread to post reaction from around the world on Big Tech's purge of opinions.

I'll start.

Germany’s Merkel hits out at Twitter over ‘problematic’ Trump ban
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/01/11/germanys-merkel-hits-out-at-twitter-over-problematic-trump-ban.html

In other words, Seibert (and by extension, Merkel) doesn't have a problem with what Twitter is doing so much as he has a problem with it being done by someone other than the government. So presumably, it would be less objectionable for the U.S. government to make everyone do exactly the same thing Twitter is doing, rather than for Twitter et al. to do it on their own.

Whatever one might think about the status of Twitter, et al. as "private" entities, Seibert's sentiment is pretty much the exact opposite of the meaning and intent of the First Amendment ...

Only Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.​

Beat me to it!

He added that governments, not private companies, should decide on any limitations to freedom of speech.

A recipe for disaster. I'll add that this makes sense to our global partners that do not have a 1st Amendment. No need for "private" proxies when the Ministry of Truth can be a full government entity, with no pesky 1st Amendment to navigate around.

 

[Occam's Banana]

Europeans... what do you expect?

Indeed. And given their government-enforced censorship of things like pro-Nazi sentiment and Holocaust denial, it is especially egregious for German government officials to be lecturing others about how "the right to freedom of opinion is of fundamental importance."

("Denazification" is coming to country near you ...)

 

[Brian4Liberty]

Glenn Greenwald:

Given both Merkel and López Obrador are denouncing the recent Silicon Valley censorship, it's probably time to call them white supremacists or "fash-adjacent" or whatever the lowly left-liberal slur of the day is for those who question the union of tech monopolies & neoliberals.

https://twitter.com/ggreenwald/status/1348748826925019139

 

[Occam's Banana]

He added that governments, not private companies, should decide on any limitations to freedom of speech.

A recipe for disaster. I'll add that this makes sense to our global partners that do not have a 1st Amendment. No need for "private" proxies when the Ministry of Truth can be a full government entity, with no pesky 1st Amendment to navigate around.

This is how they rig the game.

Heads, the government wing of the Cathedral wins.

Tails, the corporate media wing of the Cathedral wins.

 

[Anti Globalist]

I mean, this is a sound conclusion to draw. I'm not sure how they think people could see it any other way. And what's more, this reaction is going to further undermine any credibility that Biden could hope to have. He'll be sworn in surrounded by armored National Guard troops and socially-distanced onlookers with their faces covered. The history books will have the asterisk by his name. We are witnessing a strange historic moment when one political party captured control of technology to install a candidate of their choosing.

I wonder if history will blame it on the virus?

There won't be an asterisk next to Biden's name as long as Democrats keep writing history.

 

[GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged]

The ONLY reason that they are going FULL SCALE with their Censorship Ministry of Truth machine is because they KNOW WE KNOW that the Election has been stolen. This is them hiding the evidence. We are not allowed to discuss the evidence. Ask them and they will lie thru their teeth that their is no evidence.

Censorship allows them to continue to control the narrative. And they are losing the Information War. We know. We have seen the evidence. However, we may not win in the long run as censorship is but one of most of their weapons. Remember they control the Police, Military, National Guard, and most weapons. The BIG weapons. Your Crane Style Kung Fu is no match for my 80,000 NUCLEAR $#@!ING WARHEADS and this shiny little candy-like button.

Is it good or bad that we are in this situation? Censoring Alex Jones happened a long time ago. Society thought he is a jerk and doesn't deserve to be listened to. I personally think it is good that this is happening at this exact very moment. 80 million people voted for Trump and this blatant Censoring and hypocrisy has created the only hope to halt or stop the destruction.

 

[DamianTV]

Is it good or bad that we are in this situation? Censoring Alex Jones happened a long time ago. Society thought he is a jerk and doesn't deserve to be listened to. I personally think it is good that this is happening at this exact very moment. 80 million people voted for Trump and this blatant Censoring and hypocrisy has created the only hope to halt or stop the destruction.

Well, there is some good that comes from this. A word I have not heard in the last few months is Conspiracy Theory. I think some people may have figured out we have been right on a lot of stuff all along.

 

[enhanced_deficit]

Please use this thread to post reaction from around the world on Big Tech's purge of opinions.

Are we allowed to post something like this from around America ?

[h=3]Trump guts the First Amendment: signs Executive Order suppressing criticism of Israel[/h]

This may be hastily being miscategorized as 'karma', appears to be apples and oranges (private vs gummit).

[h=3][/h]

 

[CaptUSA]

Mexico