Brownback out - Who's Next?

[PollM]

Sam Brownback to Drop out of 2008 Presidential Race.

Who do you believe will be the next Republican candidate to drop out of the 2008 presidential race?

http://www.youpolls.com/details.asp?pid=738


.

 

[Akus]

who's next? lol Ron Paul is like Bill Goldberg now.

 

[austin356]

Hunter then Tancredo...

 

[saku39]

I think Hunter. By the end of January, I think Tancredo will be gone as well. I think Huckabee will hang on to the very end. I get the feeling he's trying to position himself as a possible vice president.

 

[PollM]

Sam Brownback to Drop out of 2008 Presidential Race.

Who do you believe will be the next Republican candidate to drop out of the 2008 presidential race?

http://www.youpolls.com/details.asp?pid=738


.

Trickle down.............................

I truly love this. After all the riff-raff is gone, Ron Paul is going to replace McCain then Thompson. LOL

This is Awesome GO Ron

.

 

[Primbs]

Tancredo and Hunter are both hurting for money.

 

[fletcher]

Can you please ban PollM. All he does is spam the board with polls at youpolls.

 

[JMann]

Hunter and Tancredo probably before Thanksgiving. I don't think Huck will be in much longer unless he is able to get some money. He is enjoying the press but he is broke and as well as he is doing in Iowa he isn't going to get rich fundraising there. Without a major push from the religious right he can't make it much longer. I think Huck wants to keep the door open to be VP so I bet he won't want to upset the 'front runners'.

We may want Huck to stay in as to split the Iowa vote.

 

[Phil M]

Hunter's too full of himself to drop out.

 

[PollM]

Can you please ban PollM. All he does is spam the board with polls at youpolls.

I think I'm a valued member just as much as you. I'm enthusiastic about Ron Paul.
I don't appreciate your comments, the material I post and bring to the forum is quality content.

You're malicious.
oh if you don't like it don't read it.
.

 

[fletcher]

I think I'm a valued member just as much as you. I'm enthusiastic about Ron Paul.
I don't appreciate your comments, the material I post and bring to the forum is quality content.

You're malicious.
oh if you don't like it don't read it.
.

The fact that you always link to a poll you made at a different site instead of making a poll on this forum is very suspicious. Maybe if you contributed anything besides links to polls on another site people wouldn't consider you a spammer. Food for thought.

 

[wsc321]

BTW: Now that Brownback is out, we can say that Ron Paul is the ONLY candidate in the entire GOP field with zero debt.

 

[PollM]

The fact that you always link to a poll you made at a different site instead of making a poll on this forum is very suspicious. Maybe if you contributed anything besides links to polls on another site people wouldn't consider you a spammer. Food for thought.

I do what I truly believe in.
I hope what ever I accomplish promotes Ron. That's what I try to do.
I spend the time and effort for that purpose.
My contribution has gone to him and my vote will ultimately go to him.

Thank you

 

[Akus]

Seriously, was Brownback that bad? Ok we got the Guliani is a neo con part and that Romney is basically campaigning with his own personal funds, and McCain is bad on the border and campaign finance.

Was there any thing bad about Brownback?

 

[kylebrotherton]

He has little respect for the Constitution.

He sponsored the Truth in Video Game Rating Act, the Broadcast Decency Enforcement Act, and voted for No Child Left Behind. Not to mention the 'Patrioct' Act and the War in Iraq.

 

[PollM]

I tell you what America Needs.

To get out of WARS and invest in America.

 

[Jordan]

Am I the only one who sees this as a bad thing?

We need as many people as possible in the primaries to divide the prowar vote.

 

[Brock Landers]

Am I the only one who sees this as a bad thing?

We need as many people as possible in the primaries to divide the prowar vote.

I used to think so, but having 9 prowar candidates splits TV time, debate time, media time, etc., more than I think it would really split the vote, especially where Brownback and Hunter and Huckabee are concerned. Besides, we can't count on every one of them staying in through the whole primary process, and RP squeeking by and getting the nomination with 10% of the vote. If it came even close to that scenario, Hunter or Brownback or someone else would just drop out before a key primary and throw their support over to Giuliani or something, in hopes of getting the VP nod.

Sure, the prowar vote will be split, but I'd rather see it split 4-5 ways by 4-5 semi-competent (and I use that term very loosely), committed, and cocky bastards. And I'd rather see the field narrowing right now, so that there's less 'noise' in the early primary voters' ears.

 

[sunny]

huckabee, hunter and tancredo haven't got a shot and they know it.

and don't forget mccainand romeny - they're finished...

so lemme see - who's left? hmmmmm oh yeah the ghoul and

DOCTOR RON PAUL!

 

[reduen]

Tancredo and then Hunter!