jmdrake
Member
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2007
- Messages
- 50,994
You can't even pull it up on archive.org. But I remember reading it. Bill O'Reilly remembers too.
Edit: A different archive site has it. https://archive.is/oARH0 They probably blocked crawlers using a "robots.txt", but that's just a "Please don't index me" note which a program can easily ignore. This also shows the planned to scrub this page.
Bill made one mistake in his analysis. He said that the page said they were against the traditional family but were for the "nuclear" family. The nuclear family is the traditional family. They said they were "Against the Western prescribed nuclear family." They then used weasel words to try to "fix it" by talking about the extended family. But the extended family has always been compatible with the nuclear family. The holidays of Thanksgiving, Christmas, July 4th etc all center around bringing nuclear families together for the extended family. And blacks, whites and other ethnic groups have all practiced this nuclear-extended family paradigm. But, traditionally, the nuclear family has been considered an indivisible unit. Mom (mother-in-law to spouse) is welcome to come visit and even given solicited advice, but she's not welcome to butt in. The "it takes a village to raise a child" concept that Hillary Clinton plagiarized and perverted is similar. In healthy communities people look out after other people's children. Again, blacks, whites and other ethnic groups have done that since before this was a nation. On the frontier that was a necessity. But again, the nuclear concept is important for reason of boundaries.
Anyway, the document was indefensible, very unpopular among blacks as a whole, and it's why the average black person will say "I support black lives matter the movement, not the organization."
Check this out. (And share it.)
Edit: A different archive site has it. https://archive.is/oARH0 They probably blocked crawlers using a "robots.txt", but that's just a "Please don't index me" note which a program can easily ignore. This also shows the planned to scrub this page.
Bill made one mistake in his analysis. He said that the page said they were against the traditional family but were for the "nuclear" family. The nuclear family is the traditional family. They said they were "Against the Western prescribed nuclear family." They then used weasel words to try to "fix it" by talking about the extended family. But the extended family has always been compatible with the nuclear family. The holidays of Thanksgiving, Christmas, July 4th etc all center around bringing nuclear families together for the extended family. And blacks, whites and other ethnic groups have all practiced this nuclear-extended family paradigm. But, traditionally, the nuclear family has been considered an indivisible unit. Mom (mother-in-law to spouse) is welcome to come visit and even given solicited advice, but she's not welcome to butt in. The "it takes a village to raise a child" concept that Hillary Clinton plagiarized and perverted is similar. In healthy communities people look out after other people's children. Again, blacks, whites and other ethnic groups have done that since before this was a nation. On the frontier that was a necessity. But again, the nuclear concept is important for reason of boundaries.
Anyway, the document was indefensible, very unpopular among blacks as a whole, and it's why the average black person will say "I support black lives matter the movement, not the organization."
Check this out. (And share it.)
Last edited: