Alert: Ron Paul to interview Tulsi Gabbard

[Warlord]

This is going to be good...

12pm ET

 

[oyarde]

I'll pass.

 

[sparebulb]

I just hope she wears something tight and revealing.

 

[Warlord]

I'm a bit busy so going to watch it later... anyone watching? is it good?

 

[EBounding]

Why is she even running? Is she really counting on the Ron Paul/libertarian/Trump vote to carry her to the nomination?

 

[oyarde]

Nobody wants to watch commie dem house or senate members.

 

[Slave Mentality]

Nobody wants to watch commie dem house or senate members.

Then why do the elections almost always come out 51% vs. 49%?

 

[RonZeplin]

 

[RonZeplin]

Why is she even running? Is she really counting on the Ron Paul/libertarian/Trump vote to carry her to the nomination?

Because President Donnell is the #1 DGP (Drone Gangsta President)?

Neocon exceptionalism. :bigpoo:

 

[Warlord]

Ron basically said we should work with progressives in a coalition even if we disagree on some things. He's held that position for years.

 

[A. Havnes]

Ron basically said we should work with progressives in a coalition even if we disagree on some things. He's held that position for years.

Yeah, he worked well with Dennis Kucinich as well. It's funny how quickly people forget the message and start acting like the Republicans and Democrats aren't the exact same product with different branding. You have to look at the individual running, not the party he or she is associated with.

 

[Anti Globalist]

Despite this interview, it still hasn't convinced me to vote for Gabbard.

 

[nobody's_hero]

Despite this interview, it still hasn't convinced me to vote for Gabbard.

If you live in a state with open primaries, you really don't have anything to lose by supporting her. No one is saying vote for her in the general election. I intend to vote for her in Georgia for the primaries.

None of the other democratic candidates are going to sit down and talk to someone like Dr. Paul. Not these days.

 

[nobody's_hero]

Then why do the elections almost always come out 51% vs. 49%?

Because democrats cheat but never quite enough.

 

[Origanalist]

Because democrats cheat but never quite enough.

You obviously don't live in a blue State then, it's always enough here in Washington.

 

[enhanced_deficit]

Dialog is almost always better than alternatives even with opponents.

That said, best to keep a critical posture in any such interview to avoid unnecessarily making any new political enemies at this juncture. If RP is seen as friendly with Tulsi in this interview, could potentially alienate MAGA/some some of his supporters and even cause twitter storm against liberty movement ( friend of my enemy is my enemy' doctrine seems to be popular with MAGA crowd and the leader himself, Tulsi had recently used very disrespectful langauge about the sitting POTUS invoking words often used to refer to 'female dog'). One thing where MAGA and his supporters are consistent is that they always counter punch when MAGA is attacked.


One of the question to keep atmosphere neutral could be to ask her, what did she do to win 'Freedom Award' from one of the biggest globalist neocons?

Weird, her name is gone from the list!

According to this archived version of CFR members, Tulsi Gabbard was (?) a member of the CFR at least until 29 May 2019: http://archive.is/TczSw

In 2016 Tulsi received the Champion of Freedom Award at the Jewish Values Gala in New York City, which was co-hosted and sponsored by Sheldon Adelson.
See Gabbard with Sheldon’s wife, Miriam Adelson

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/three-questions-about-tulsi_b_10212942

 

[Anti Federalist]

Ron basically said we should work with progressives in a coalition even if we disagree on some things. He's held that position for years.

Yes, he has.

And I used to agree.

Until the Bolshevik/Jacobin left declared open warfare on me and mine, roughly 5 years ago now.

Now, fuck them, "progressives" that is.

I wouldn't piss down your average progressive's throat, if their fucking guts were on fire.

 

[oyarde]

Ron basically said we should work with progressives in a coalition even if we disagree on some things. He's held that position for years.

I could get behind it if it was some things . When it is 99 percent then that is different . Pol Pot and I have one thing in common . We both had a lot of rifles

 

[ProBlue33]

Given everything that is going on, I favor Ron Paul stance towards Gabbard.
Sure Gabbard has some stances that we disagree with but she is the only one that doesn't say "screw all Trump voters" and instead says I want to heal America by meeting in the middle.
This is just me but if I was in NH the stratagem should not to vote for Trump he is going to win anyways, but vote for Gabbard, it's basically what Ron was advocating.
I get the idea that every other candidate is just happy to get support from 51% of the country to win the election and say to bad so sad for all you other people.
Everything I have heard Tulsi says she want to please all political stripes with a pragmatic approach, of course there is a base of 10% on each side that will always viciously oppose you, some are posting here on RPF.
I continue to believe Gabbard would be better for America than Trump, but that Trump would be better than every other democratic candidate. Because they will out of pure spite reverse everything Trump did, even all the stuff that is working really well for America.
Judges are very critical as well, when a political challenge goes to the supreme court they are not 100% immune to bias even though they should be.

 

[Swordsmyth]

Yes, he has.

And I used to agree.

Until the Bolshevik/Jacobin left declared open warfare on me and mine, roughly 5 years ago now.

Now, $#@! them, "progressives" that is.

I wouldn't piss down your average progressive's throat, if their $#@!ing guts were on fire.

We should work with anyone on issues, we should not let people who are more against us than for us into our movement.