• Welcome to our new home!

    Please share any thoughts or issues here.


200 PBS Stations to Air “Fire Did Not Cause Building 7’s Collapse on 9/11"

Created4

Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2007
Messages
3,470
200 PBS Stations to Air “Fire Did Not Cause Building 7’s Collapse on 9/11"

200 PBS Stations to Air Documentary on Study — “Fire Did Not Cause Building 7’s Collapse on 9/11”

By Matt Agorist

Rarely, in the two decades since 9/11 has the mainstream media done anything but uphold the establishment’s narrative on the official story of that tragic day. This is in spite of countless testimonies from experts in the field, government agents, law enforcement, and even the president contradicting the official narrative. However, on Thursday, all that changed, and 200 PBS affiliates across the country will start airing a mini-documentary about the explosive findings of the recently completed University of Alaska Fairbanks study on the destruction of World Trade Center Building 7.

The film is titled Spotlight On: SEVEN and will run for three whole months on 200 local PBS stations, reaching millions. Below is an announcement on the paradigm shifting move by PBS from Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth:

For those wanting to watch the short film on television, “Spotlight On” programs do not air at scheduled times because they run as needed in between longer shows. To have a good chance of catching it, you’ll need to be tuned in to PBS often. But rest assured that Spotlight On: SEVEN will be seen by at least three million people, most of whom will never have heard of or seen the collapse of Building 7.

We at Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth are grateful to the hundreds of supporters who donated so that SEVEN could air on PBS.

The impending release of SEVEN on PBS has been attracting media coverage all week, including this report on nationally broadcast Fox News Radio:



The idea of such an establishment-challenging narrative playing to millions of Americans on one of the most critical instances in American history, cannot be overstated. It is massive.

As TFTP reported in April, Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth announced the completed partnership with the University of Alaska Fairbanks (UAF) in their final report of an in depth four-year study on what they say actually brought down WTC 7. According to the press release, contrary to the conclusions of NIST, the UAF research team finds that the collapse of WTC 7 on 9/11 was not caused by fires but instead was caused by the near-simultaneous failure of every column in the building.

“Our study found that the fires in WTC 7 could not have caused the observed collapse,” said Professor Leroy Hulsey, the study’s principal investigator. “The only way it could have fallen in the observed manner is by the near-simultaneous failure of every column.”

The extensive four-year study was was funded by Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth (AE911Truth), a nonprofit organization representing more than 3,000 architects and engineers who have signed the organization’s petition calling for new investigation into the destruction of the three World Trade Center towers on 9/11.

“We are proud to have supported the University of Alaska Fairbanks and Professor Leroy Hulsey in conducting a genuinely scientific study into the reasons for this building’s collapse,” said Richard Gage, president and founder of AE911Truth. “It is now incumbent upon the building community, the media, and government officials to reckon with the implications of these findings and launch a new full-scale investigation.”

According to the study’s authors:

The UAF research team utilized three approaches for examining the structural response of WTC 7 to the conditions that may have occurred on September 11, 2001.

First, we simulated the local structural response to fire loading that may have occurred below Floor 13, where most of the fires in WTC 7 are reported to have occurred.

Second, we supplemented our own simulation by examining the collapse initiation hypothesis developed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST).

Third, we simulated a number of scenarios within the overall structural system in order to determine what types of local failures and their locations may have caused the total collapse to occur as observed.

After conducting comprehensive modeling and studying countless scenarios, the study’s authors, J. Leroy Hulsey, Ph.D., P.E., S.E., UAF, Zhili Quan, Ph.D., Bridge Engineer South Carolina Department of Transportation, and Feng Xiao, Ph.D., Associate Professor Nanjing University of Science and Technology Department of Civil Engineering, concluded the following:

The results of this study cannot be dismissed, nor can the fact that the mainstream is now broadcasting it to millions of Americans. It completely destroys the narrative that has been shoved down the throats of Americans for nearly two decades. What’s more, this study backs up thousands of other researchers, scientists, and engineers who have been pointing this out for years.

Below is the official trailer. It is only 2 minutes long, but extremely powerful, which begs the question, do you think it will be allowed to run the entire three month period?

 
$10 says that the document will show how debris from one of the twin towers causes building 7 fall down. A gov. funded PBS isn’t going to say “yep, we lied... oops, don’t mind all the lives we killed in the Middle East and all the rights we stripped away with the Patriot Act all in the name of freedom!!!! Remember, you are either with us or against us!!!”
 
$10 says that the document will show how debris from one of the twin towers causes building 7 fall down. A gov. funded PBS isn’t going to say “yep, we lied... oops, don’t mind all the lives we killed in the Middle East and all the rights we stripped away with the Patriot Act all in the name of freedom!!!! Remember, you are either with us or against us!!!”

The trailer already says it wasn't fire, but that chemicals were involved.

This either gets pulled before it can air, or it is a controlled opposition response for a greater purpose. (Like throwing out a bone to the Q believers to keep them following.....)
 
$10 says that the document will show how debris from one of the twin towers causes building 7 fall down. A gov. funded PBS isn’t going to say “yep, we lied... oops, don’t mind all the lives we killed in the Middle East and all the rights we stripped away with the Patriot Act all in the name of freedom!!!! Remember, you are either with us or against us!!!”

It says that the only way it could have collapsed is if every column simultaneously collapsed, which is not going to be caused by debris fall on one side of the building.
 
$10 says that the document will show how debris from one of the twin towers causes building 7 fall down. A gov. funded PBS isn’t going to say “yep, we lied... oops, don’t mind all the lives we killed in the Middle East and all the rights we stripped away with the Patriot Act all in the name of freedom!!!! Remember, you are either with us or against us!!!”


Additionally, the film was produced by Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth - they have been at the forefront of the truth movement for well over a decade.
 
Donnell & Ruby's fake 9/11 story is being exposed

the cover up for Bibi & Boy Muhammad has FAILED

addtext_com_mdkwmdqxmtcymq.jpg
 
Last edited:
Donnell & Ruby's fake 9/11 story is being exposed

the cover up for Bibi & Boy Muhammad has FAILED

If you're wrong and Trump helps expose the 9/11 charade, will you change your mind and support him?
 
I support Donnell's impeachment, trial & hanging for treason. :100:

What if doing so meant that 9/11 didn't get exposed, yet had you avoided that it would have been exposed?

Wouldn't you feel really awful?
 
If 9/11 was proved to be masterminded by Trump himself half the people on RPF would still support him

And justify it as "part of the plan." Quantum Dark Energy Wormhole Chess donchaknow?

Complete horse shit.

See how you have to make shit up just to slander Trump supporters? You can't even slander them based on actual facts.
 
Complete horse shit.

See how you have to make shit up just to slander Trump supporters? You can't even slander them based on actual facts.


Merely a hypothetical based upon readily observable patterns of behavior. Hitting too close to home?
 
If you're wrong and Trump helps expose the 9/11 charade, will you change your mind and support him?

Complete horse $#@!.

See how you have to make $#@! up just to...

...support Trump? You can't even support him...

...based on actual facts.

No wonder you hang on every word Q utters. At least when Q makes stuff up you can link a source.

Sure beats looking at his actual record, doesn't it?
 
Last edited:
...support Trump? You can't even support him...


Notice how Trumpkins always accuse anyone who calls them out of doing exactly thise things said Trumpkins themselves have been doing right along? What's up with that? (He asks rhetorically)
 
Notice how Trumpkins always accuse anyone who calls them out of doing exactly thise things said Trumpkins themselves have been doing right along? What's up with that? (He asks rhetorically)

When you have your head so far up your butt all you can see is what you had for lunch, it's hard to tell what others are actually doing.
 
Back
Top