Trump announces Emergency Actions 1st Day to Drastically Reduce the Cost of Living

[Swordsmyth]

Donald Trump announces Emergency Actions the Day he Takes Office to Drastically Reduce the Cost of Living

• On Day 1…
He will Sign an Executive Order directing every Federal Agency to immediately remove every burdensome regulation that drive up the cost of goods.

• On Day 1…
He will create a new cabinet position for a senior member in his administration who will be tasked exclusively with doing everything to reduce the cost of living.

This tells me he’s been planning this for a LONG TIME… and it included this time period… Bidens Presidency.. because under Biden, Trumps SCOTUS picks and their decisions have paved the way with removing virtually ALL regulations that have destroyed this country.

Those SCOTUS Decisions will fundamentally transform this country into an economic POWERHOUSE!

Get ready everyone, because a GOLDEN AGE IS COMING!

https://rumble.com/v5kyvky-donald-tr...of-living.html

https://x.com/MJTruthUltra/status/1852070405202170024

[TheCount]

His solution to reducing the cost of living is to increase the size of the federal government?

[vita3]

Moronic Post & “solution”

Like he going to cut MIC by significantly increasing their budget & forming a new branch of military (which he did space force)

[Swordsmyth]

His solution to reducing the cost of living is to increase the size of the federal government?

By reducing its size and scope.

[GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged]

All I can say to all you Trump haters is that if Ron Paul said this people would think it was a good idea.

[CCTelander]

If one believes that all good things come from government, and without government “doing something” no good can be achieved, this makes perfect sense.

What can government “do” to reduce the cost of living and increase prosperity?

Get the hell out of the way.

We don’t need yet another “cabinet position,” and no doubt government agency to go with it to accomplish that.

Epic fail.

[jmdrake]

All I can say to all you Trump haters is that if Ron Paul said this people would think it was a good idea.

Well to be fair I Ron Paul said he was going to do this after not doing it for 4 years when he was president I don't think a lot of people would have faith in Ron Paul. Yep, what he says here is great. That track record though. But we shall see. I suspect Trump will end the Ukraine war quickly and end sanctions on Russia but I guess he doesn't feel comfortable coming out and saying that. Those two steps would go along way to cutting inflation.

See: https://www.businessinsider.com/us-r...ukraine-2024-5

[TheCount]

By reducing its size and scope.

Expanding the cabinet is the opposite of reducing it

[CCTelander]

Expanding the cabinet is the opposite of reducing it

You gotta cut Swordy some slack. He has trouble with subtle nuances like that.

[TheCount]

You gotta cut Swordy some slack. He has trouble with subtle nuances like that.

Draining the swamp is when you give government jobs to every establishment elite who supports you in the election

[69360]

All I can say to all you Trump haters is that if Ron Paul said this people would think it was a good idea.

It's a good idea, but nowhere near specific enough. This announcement could be anything. It could range from lowering the cost of a loaf of bread by a few cents to eliminating income tax, to more handouts. It could be good or bad. Show us specifics.

[CaptUSA]

His solution to reducing the cost of living is to increase the size of the federal government?

I proposed something very similar here: http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthr...vt-Agency-WFAA

Let's hope someone on his team has been reading these forums. I'd love a new government agency that didn't have a budget except what they could carve out from other cuts!

[unknown]

By reducing its size and scope.

What did George Bush say when signing the Banker Bailouts, we need socialism to save capitalism...

[unknown]

His solution to reducing the cost of living is to increase the size of the federal government?

What are you, retarded?

Creating more agencies, departments and expanding the bureaucracy, obviously reduces the size, power and scope of government.

[TheCount]

What are you, retarded?

Creating more agencies, departments and expanding the bureaucracy, obviously reduces the size, power and scope of government.

I shouldn't be surprised by the proposal from the "you have to give up liberty to save liberty" crowd

[fisharmor]

And we're just now hearing about this five days before the election because......

[WarriorLiberty]

And we're just now hearing about this five days before the election because......

What Has Harris purposed?

"WE GOTTA STAY WOKE HAHAHAHA HAHA Harris"

[oyarde]

Remove every burdensome regulation driving increased costs ? Sounds like DEA , BATFE and USDA just got fired, lol

[oyarde]

All I can say to all you Trump haters is that if Ron Paul said this people would think it was a good idea.

Id surmise it is fair to take wait and see , Ron pretty consistent and trump will need to demonstrate it, but yes, like JM Drake my guess is we will be doing less pot stirring in ukraine etc

[Snowball]

Can you get any more vague? pfft.

[unknown]

All I can say to all you Trump haters is that if Ron Paul said this people would think it was a good idea.

Ron Paul would not take steps to reduce the power, size and scope of government by expanding it...

The Executive and Legislative branches have the power now to downsize government without first expanding it.

Obviously.

[TheTexan]

If one believes that all good things come from government, and without government “doing something” no good can be achieved, this makes perfect sense.

What can government “do” to reduce the cost of living and increase prosperity?

Get the hell out of the way.

We don’t need yet another “cabinet position,” and no doubt government agency to go with it to accomplish that.

Epic fail.

I can't tell if this is TDS or just ideology gone stupid, but goddamn, if you don't want even one person in government who's only assigned role is to reduce government, then you never should have voted for or supported Ron Paul, because that's exactly what he would have been as well.

[Swordsmyth]

If one believes that all good things come from government, and without government “doing something” no good can be achieved, this makes perfect sense.

What can government “do” to reduce the cost of living and increase prosperity?

Get the hell out of the way.

We don’t need yet another “cabinet position,” and no doubt government agency to go with it to accomplish that.

Epic fail.

This is about government doing less.
Learn to read.

[Swordsmyth]

Expanding the cabinet is the opposite of reducing it

Adding one cabinet position to eliminate bureaucrats and possibly other cabinet positions is reducing government.
This is just the kind of thing Ron would do.
We have enough people dedicated to growing government, it's time we put someone in charge of reducing it.

[Swordsmyth]

Remove every burdensome regulation driving increased costs ? Sounds like DEA , BATFE and USDA just got fired, lol

That's the idea.

But the TDS crowd would rather have Camela multiply government.

[Occam's Banana]

The first action of Elon's "Department of Government Efficiency" should be to abolish Trump's "Department of Reducing the Cost of Living".

[Swordsmyth]

The first action of Elon's "Department of Government Efficiency" should be to abolish Trump's "Department of Reducing the Cost of Living".

Because we wouldn't want to lose all those regulations and the bureaucrats associated with them?

[Occam's Banana]

Because we wouldn't want to lose all those regulations and the bureaucrats associated with them?

No.

Because you don't need a whole new cabinet-level bureaucracy to do those things.

Especially not for just the relatively narrow subject area of "reducing the cost of living". [1]

I mean, talk about "inefficienty"! Sheesh!



[1] Why not also have a "Department of Reducing the Cost of Doing Business" and a "Department of Reducing the Cost of This Thing" and a "Department of Reducing the Cost of That Thing" and a "Department of Reducing the Cost of the Other Thing" and ...

[Occam's Banana]

Why not also have a "Department of Reducing the Cost of Doing Business" and a "Department of Reducing the Cost of This Thing" and a "Department of Reducing the Cost of That Thing" and a "Department of Reducing the Cost of the Other Thing" and ...

First Rule of "Department of Government Efficiency" Club: don't create any other new departments.

[TheTexan]

No.

Because you don't need a whole new cabinet-level bureaucracy to do those things.

What does a cabinet position even entail? Does it automatically mean a higher level of bureaucracy vs a non-cabinet position?

Or is it just a fancy title?